2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00712-020-00715-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-jurisdiction migration and the fiscal policies of local governments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can therefore establish the following result regarding the implementation of the full-information optimum through decentralized regional debt decisions. 12 Proposition 4.1 Suppose that regional welfare is specified to be the welfare of natives. The full-information optimum is attained through decentralized regional debt decisions by setting z A = z A,F B , z B = z B,F B , an upper bound b A,F B on the public debt in region A, and an upper bound b B,F B on the public debt in region B.…”
Section: Justifying Differentiated Budget Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can therefore establish the following result regarding the implementation of the full-information optimum through decentralized regional debt decisions. 12 Proposition 4.1 Suppose that regional welfare is specified to be the welfare of natives. The full-information optimum is attained through decentralized regional debt decisions by setting z A = z A,F B , z B = z B,F B , an upper bound b A,F B on the public debt in region A, and an upper bound b B,F B on the public debt in region B.…”
Section: Justifying Differentiated Budget Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the impact of local fiscal conditions on immigration decisions. It is included the impact of fiscal models on immigration decisions [ 3 ]; The impact of fiscal structure on immigration decisions [ 4 , 5 ]; The effect of the host’s fiscal situation on the migration outcome [ 6 ]; Using fiscal tools to attract immigrants [ 7 9 ], such as the use of tax policies to attract immigrants [ 9 , 10 ] and generate fiscal competition [ 11 , 12 ]; And the impact of public services on immigration [ 13 ]. Second, the impact of migration on the public finance in receiving economies [ 14 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%