2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-observer reliability of measurements performed on digital long-leg standing radiographs and assessment of validity compared to 3D CT-scan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ICC shows a good and very good correlation for the radiographic measurement between all examiners. These results are comparable to those, which are published for standard limb alignment on long leg x-rays (ICC = 0.7 to 0.8) [5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The ICC shows a good and very good correlation for the radiographic measurement between all examiners. These results are comparable to those, which are published for standard limb alignment on long leg x-rays (ICC = 0.7 to 0.8) [5].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The quality of the radiograph is crucial for the success and accuracy of the measurements. However, long-leg radiographs show good validity compared with 3D CT scans [ 34 ]. The quality of the JL measurement is based on an intact bone stock on the femoral side.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recently, Boonen et al showed better reliability and validity of the measurement on long leg radiograph compared with three-dimensional analysis. 23 Therefore, it is believed that our results were not affected with the means of photography. Finally, clinical outcomes with postoperative alignment using the HCC and TCC angles were not assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%