2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-observer variability and its correlation to experience in measurement of lower limb mechanical axis on long leg radiographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors have mentioned improved interobserver and intraobserver agreement using CT scans but did not explain this in detail. We have noticed that an interobserver agreement increases with the seniority and experience of the observer, probably due to better understanding and identification of the anatomical landmarks [3]. We believe that in the present study the ease of identification of anatomical landmarks using CT scans also helped improve interobserver agreement.…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The authors have mentioned improved interobserver and intraobserver agreement using CT scans but did not explain this in detail. We have noticed that an interobserver agreement increases with the seniority and experience of the observer, probably due to better understanding and identification of the anatomical landmarks [3]. We believe that in the present study the ease of identification of anatomical landmarks using CT scans also helped improve interobserver agreement.…”
supporting
confidence: 51%
“…It is absolutely important to reduce the radiation exposure whenever possible. Thus, we adopted an autoexposure control system to minimize nonessential radiation exposure [3]. We also agree that the method of using scout films to calculate the 3D mechanical axis is desirable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, measurement of the mechanical axis on long leg radiographs is considered useful to assess the pre operative deformities of the knee and to check on the restoration of limb alignment after TKA. Vaishya et al 10 reported intra observer variability in these measurments and found that the accuracy depends on of the experience of the personnel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%