2013
DOI: 10.3989/scimar.03763.02a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-population differences in otolith morphology are genetically encoded in the killifish <i>Aphanius fasciatus</i> (Cyprinodontiformes)

Abstract: SUMMARY: Inter-population differences in otolith shape, morphology and chemistry have been used effectively as indicators for stock assessment or for recognizing environmental adaptation in fishes. However, the precise parameters that affect otolith morphology remain incompletely understood. Here we provide the first direct support for the hypothesis that inter-population differences in otolith morphology are genetically encoded. The study is based on otolith morphology and two mitochondrial markers (D-loop, 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the importance of the genotype with regard to shaping both the physiological and the otolith response to natural environmental variability should not be underestimated ). Recently, the implicit assumption of many otolith shape studies, namely a population-specific genetic component to otolith shape, has been substantiated (Vignon and Morat 2010;Annabi et al 2013), adding further to the link between genetic make-up and otolith characteristics of populations and individuals.…”
Section: Otolith Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the importance of the genotype with regard to shaping both the physiological and the otolith response to natural environmental variability should not be underestimated ). Recently, the implicit assumption of many otolith shape studies, namely a population-specific genetic component to otolith shape, has been substantiated (Vignon and Morat 2010;Annabi et al 2013), adding further to the link between genetic make-up and otolith characteristics of populations and individuals.…”
Section: Otolith Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in OMA may be affected by the ecological conditions, physiological state of species and its habitat (Grønkjaer, 2016). Both genetic and environmental conditions have an impact on the morphological variability of sagitta (Lombarte et al, 2010;Annabi et al, 2013). Additionally, changes in otolith mass asymmetry can have a deleterious impact on other aspects of fish life, particularly their ability to hear and balance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of otolith‐related literature reveals that ear stones of members of the Aphaniidae family have attracted a lot of attention in phylogenetical, biogeographical, and paleontological studies (Chiozzi et al, 2018; Esmaeili et al, 2018; Ferrito et al, 2013; Reichenbacher & Kowalke, 2009; Wildekamp, 1993). Otolith‐based studies on this family have been done about species and population identifications, past vicariance events, population connectivity, and ontogenetic development (Annabi et al, 2013; Gholami, Esmaeili, Erpenbeck, & Reichenbacher, 2015; Gholami, Esmaeili, & Reichenbacher, 2015; Reichenbacher et al, 2007; Reichenbacher, Feulner, & Schulz‐Mirbach, 2009; Teimori, Jawad, et al, 2012; Teimori, Schulz‐Mirbach, et al, 2012). New researches conducted on the ontogeny of some aphaniids of the middle east such as Aphanius darabensis , A .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%