Inter-Professional Practices of Private-Sector Physiotherapists for Low Back Pain Management: Who, How, and When?

Abstract

Although there have been increasing demands for health care providers to take part in inter-professional practices in recent years, very little attention has been paid to the actualization of such practices in the private sector. This study describes private-sector physiotherapists' inter-professional practices regarding low back pain (LBP) management and identifies organizational and provider-level variables associated with the intensity of such practices. A total of 327 randomly selected physiotherapists were surveyed in the province of Quebec. Data were analyzed using descriptive and multiple regression analyses. Physiotherapists reported frequent interactions with other physiotherapists (daily/weekly for 52.6%), family physicians (51.0%), and physiotherapy (PT) assistants (45.2%), but infrequent interactions with psychologists (3.6%), neurosurgeons (0.9%), and chiropractors (0.3%). Frequently reported means of interactions were written and oral messages sent through clients (55.1% and 24.1%, respectively), face-to-face unplanned discussions (41.9%), and faxed or mailed letters (23.2%). Variables associated with the intensity of inter-professional practices (mean of 6.7 [ 1.7] out of 10 on the Intensity of Interprofessional Practices Questionnaire for Private Sector Physiotherapists) were related to physiotherapists' clientele, social activities with other providers, and perceptions of inter-professional practices as well as organizational models, vision, and provision of PT training. There is room to improve inter-professional practices with private-sector physiotherapists involved in managing LBP. Targets for action include physiotherapists and their workplaces.

Older adults’ perceptions and experiences of interprofessional communication as part of the delivery of integrated care in the primary healthcare sector: a meta-ethnography of qualitative studies

“…In the context of home care services, the health professional interacts with various other health professionals during the day. It is difficult for the older adult to always be involved in the IPC as interactions are daily and often unplanned [ 47 ]. To be able to meet the individual perceptions and needs of older adults regarding IPC, we suggest that healthcare services work in line with integrated care, where the goal is ‘to optimise the interface between different sectors and professional groups from the patient’s perspective’ [ 9 ].…”

Supporting ethics educators in Canadian occupational therapy and physical therapy programs: A national interprofessional knowledge exchange project

“…The importance of personal/social relationships to foster interprofessional collaboration has also been demonstrated (Perreault, Dionne, Rossignol, Poitras, & Morin, 2016). These elements are among key aspects or attributes often associated with interprofessional collaboration, although the definition of the concept still varies (D'Amour, Ferrada-Videla, San Martin Rodriguez, & Beaulieu, 2005;Perreault & Careau, 2012;Thannhauser, Russell-Mayhew, & Scott, 2010).…”