2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of a movement control test in shoulder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the models was also evaluated using the Kappa statistic or Kappa coefficient (see Table 11) (Cohen, 1960;Ma & Redmond, 1995;Lo & Yeung, 2007). Kappa coefficient measures the inter-rater reliability and the intra-rater reliability for qualitative items (Rajasekar et al, 2017). The Kappa coefficient is assumed to be a more accurate measure than the usually used percent agreement calculation, due to the fact that it accounts for the agreement occurring by chance (Anderson & Delahanty, 2020;Duc et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the models was also evaluated using the Kappa statistic or Kappa coefficient (see Table 11) (Cohen, 1960;Ma & Redmond, 1995;Lo & Yeung, 2007). Kappa coefficient measures the inter-rater reliability and the intra-rater reliability for qualitative items (Rajasekar et al, 2017). The Kappa coefficient is assumed to be a more accurate measure than the usually used percent agreement calculation, due to the fact that it accounts for the agreement occurring by chance (Anderson & Delahanty, 2020;Duc et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CMCTs are not tests of functional performance but are suggested to inform of loss of choice in movement. CMCTs have demonstrated good to excellent inter-and intra-rater reliability (Luomajoki et al, 2007, Mischiati et al, 2015, Rajasekar et al, 2017, Lenzlinger-Asprion et al, 2017, Segarra et al, 2015, Webb et al, 2018, Monnier et al, 2012.…”
Section: Cognitive Movement Control Tests For Assessing Patterns Of Movement Coordination Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CMCTs described in the present paper follow clear principles of assessment procedure; a clearly defined start position, end position and benchmark that must be achieved through the test Examples include: Arm Flexion Test Mottram, 2012, Mottram, 2003), Kinetic Medial Rotation Test (Morrissey et al, 2008, Comerford and Mottram, 2012, Rajasekar et al, 2017, Small Knee Bend Test (Comerford and Mottram, 2012, Mischiati et al, 2015, Botha et al, 2014, Double Knee Swing Test (Comerford and Mottram, 2012, McNeill, 2014, Mischiati et al, 2015 and Split Squat and Fast Feet Change Test (Mischiati et al, 2015). Details of the principles of test procedures are set out in Table 1.…”
Section: Cognitive Movement Control Tests For Assessing Patterns Of Movement Coordination Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If a functional movement is faulty and is the cause, or the result, of pain or injury in the mechanical system, it suggests that a movement assessment identifying the joints and the planes the faults occur at is required (Comerford and Mottram, 2012). Continuing validation of aspects of this assessment process is currently being published in this Journal (Rajasekar et al, 2017).…”
Section: Components Of Functional Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%