2024
DOI: 10.1002/lio2.1298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter‐rater reliability and clinical relevance of subjective and objective interpretation of videofluoroscopy findings

Jonna Kuuskoski,
Jaakko Vanhatalo,
Jussi Hirvonen
et al.

Abstract: BackgroundDysphagia is commonly evaluated using videofluoroscopy (VFS). As its ratings are usually subjective normal‐abnormal ratings, objective measurements have been developed. We compared the inter‐rater reliability of the usual VFS ratings to the objective measurement VFS ratings and evaluated their clinical relevance.MethodsTwo blinded raters analyzed the subjective normal‐abnormal ratings of 77 patients' VFS. Two other blinded raters analyzed the objective measurements of pharyngeal aerated area with bol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 0 publications
references
References 49 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance

No citations

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?