2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2009.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-rater reliability and smallest real difference of the Chinese Psychoeducational Profile-third edition for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smallest real differences of the Chinese PEP-3 ranged from 5.8 to 12.8 for the subtests, and 7.3 to 18.0 for the composites (Fu et al 2010). With respect to its validity, scores of the Chinese PEP-3 subtests have been shown to be significantly correlated with scores of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS), the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), the Autism Behavior ChecklistSecond Edition (ABC-2), and the Brief Ability Rating Scale (BARS) (Schopler et al 2005).…”
Section: Chinese Psychoeducational Profile-third Edition (Pep-3)mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The smallest real differences of the Chinese PEP-3 ranged from 5.8 to 12.8 for the subtests, and 7.3 to 18.0 for the composites (Fu et al 2010). With respect to its validity, scores of the Chinese PEP-3 subtests have been shown to be significantly correlated with scores of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS), the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), the Autism Behavior ChecklistSecond Edition (ABC-2), and the Brief Ability Rating Scale (BARS) (Schopler et al 2005).…”
Section: Chinese Psychoeducational Profile-third Edition (Pep-3)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As regards the reliability of the PEP-3, the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability for subtests and composites are good in both the original and the Chinese version (Fu et al 2010;Schopler et al 2005). The smallest real differences of the Chinese PEP-3 ranged from 5.8 to 12.8 for the subtests, and 7.3 to 18.0 for the composites (Fu et al 2010).…”
Section: Chinese Psychoeducational Profile-third Edition (Pep-3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Psychoeducational Profile, Third Edition (PEP-3; Schopler, Lansing, Reichler, & Marcus, 2005) was designed to assess the skills of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and communicative disabilities. A Chinese version is under construction (Fu et al, 2010). The previous version (Psychoeducational Profile-Revised [PEP-R]) has been translated for use in Brazil (De Leon, Bosa, Hugo, & Hutz, 2004), Estonia (Kikas & Haïdkind, 2003), the Netherlands (Steerneman, Muris, Merckelbach, & Willems, 1997), and Italy (Villa et al, 2010), but no separate standardization research has been done.…”
Section: The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale Of Intelligence Thmentioning
confidence: 99%