2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-ray variation in metatarsal strength properties in humans and African apes: Implications for inferring bipedal biomechanics in the Olduvai Hominid 8 foot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on loading of the forefoot during walking has highlighted the role of the metatarsophalangeal joints as a stiff propulsive lever at the end of stance phase (Griffin, Gordon, Richmond, & Antón, 2008;Griffin & Richmond, 2005;Jashashvili, Dowdeswell, Lebrun, & Carlson, 2015;Marchi, 2005;Patel et al, 2018). The metatarsal heads are in contact with the ground for at least 50% of stance phase and form part of this weight-bearing fulcrum (Jacob, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on loading of the forefoot during walking has highlighted the role of the metatarsophalangeal joints as a stiff propulsive lever at the end of stance phase (Griffin, Gordon, Richmond, & Antón, 2008;Griffin & Richmond, 2005;Jashashvili, Dowdeswell, Lebrun, & Carlson, 2015;Marchi, 2005;Patel et al, 2018). The metatarsal heads are in contact with the ground for at least 50% of stance phase and form part of this weight-bearing fulcrum (Jacob, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern of robusticity within the metatarsals is similar to humans, though unlike the most common human pattern . More recent microcomputed tomography (μCT) analysis of the internal cortical structure of OH 8 reveals metatarsal robusticity patterns unlike humans or apes . However, the talus of OH 8 is not Homo ‐like at all.…”
Section: Homo Feetmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…110 More recent microcomputed tomography (μCT) analysis of the internal cortical structure of OH 8 reveals metatarsal robusticity patterns unlike humans or apes. 111 However, the talus of OH 8 is not navicular is very pinched laterally, more so than in LB1 or Little Foot." It is likely that when fully published this fossil will provide much needed clarity regarding the morphology of the early Homo foot in Africa.…”
Section: Homo Feetmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following previous researchers (Byron, Herrel, Pauwels, Muynck, & Patel, ; Lewton, Ritzman, Copes, Garland, & Capellini, ; Patel, Jashashvili, et al, ; Patel, Organ, et al, ), cross‐sectional properties were calculated using the SliceGeometry protocol with default thresholding settings in the BoneJ plugin (Doube et al, ) implemented in ImageJ software (Schneider, Rasband, & Eliceiri, ). The following cross‐sectional properties were calculated: maximum and minimum second moments of area ( I max and I min ) and polar section modulus ( Z p ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether differences exist in strength properties in proximal tarsal bones like the elongated calcaneus among species that differ in leaping prevalence remains unknown. This is because the only foot bones of nonhuman primates in which cross‐sectional geometry has been studied are metatarsals, wherein predictable relationships between strength properties and locomotion have been found in apes and monkeys (e.g., Marchi, , ; Patel et al, ; Patel, Organ, Jashashvili, Bui, & Dunsworth, ). Although the calcaneus is frequently modeled as a beam in ungulates (e.g., Keenan, Mears, & Skedros, ; Skedros, Su, Knight, Bloebaum, & Bachus, ; Su, Skedros, Bachus, & Bloebaum, ), this method has yet to be applied to the distally elongated calcaneus of galagids, which resembles a long bone in both external morphology and in cross section (Hall‐Craggs, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%