2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-relationship between firm growth and profitability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
90
2
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
90
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…When evaluating the results, it needs to be noted, that growth potential is a reversed scale, and so the correlations indicate opposite direction relationships to the other constructs. The support of H1 -a positive relationship between firm growth and past profitability -is aligned with extant literature demonstrating a positive relationship between past profit and current firm growth (Davidsson et al, 2009;Jang & Park, 2011;Lee, 2014). Furthermore, it corresponds to the findings of Hall and Tochterman (2008) on Australian firms, empirically supporting that past profitability is related to current firm growth.…”
Section: Results and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When evaluating the results, it needs to be noted, that growth potential is a reversed scale, and so the correlations indicate opposite direction relationships to the other constructs. The support of H1 -a positive relationship between firm growth and past profitability -is aligned with extant literature demonstrating a positive relationship between past profit and current firm growth (Davidsson et al, 2009;Jang & Park, 2011;Lee, 2014). Furthermore, it corresponds to the findings of Hall and Tochterman (2008) on Australian firms, empirically supporting that past profitability is related to current firm growth.…”
Section: Results and Implicationssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Studies examining the relationship between past profitability and current firm growth predominantly find positive relationships (Jang & Park, 2011;Lee, 2014). Although Davidsson et al (2009) demonstrate a significant relationship, in the Australian context Fitzsimmons et al (2005) find the growth-profitability relationship ambiguous.…”
Section: Hypothesising the Profit-growth Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. (2010) found that size has a negative relationship with firm value, which is consistent with Jang and Park (2011). Therefore, we develop the hypothesis as follows:…”
Section: Size and Firm Valuesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, there are studies that find different results. For example, Jang and Park (2011) suggested that there is a negative relationship between firm size and firm value.…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, they identified the Penrose effect, which means that the current rate of returns acts as a positive factor for the future growth rate of firm size, while the current growth rate of firm size has a negative effect on future rate of returns. Jang and Park [45] conducted an empirical study on the relationship between growth and profitability using a panel data of restaurants. Their findings showed that past profitability of restaurants has a positive effect on current growth, and past growth has a negative effect on the growth rate.…”
Section: Relationship Between Firm Growth and Profitability And Our Hmentioning
confidence: 99%