Inter-Sectoral Collaboration in Municipal Health Centres: A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Supporting Organizational Elements and Individual Drivers

Abstract

Introduction: Community health centres accommodating different professional groups are expected to improve inter-sectoral collaboration between primary care providers. This study aimed to identify what has been done to support inter-sectoral collaboration between municipal professionals and general practitioners in health centres, and to explore the interactions that emerge between these professionals at the operational level. Methods: The study was a multi-site qualitative study carried out in four municipal health centres in a Danish region. The study was based on documents and qualitative interviews with general practitioners, and municipal professionals and administrators in each of the health centres. A content analysis was conducted. Results: The study found that little attention had been given to the organizational prerequisites for enhanced inter-sectoral collaboration in the health centres. Even though some health centres had employed coordinators, these did not play a significant role as facilitators of collaboration partly due to a lack of political and managerial attention. At the operational level, inter-sectoral collaboration was limited to ad hoc interactions between professionals. Although these interactions could be useful, they did not evolve into more systematic forms of collaboration. Conclusion: The gap between policy visions and actual implementation efforts found in this study suggests that a more active and focused engagement from the political-administrative level is needed if the visions of increased inter-sectoral collaboration in health centres are to be realised.

Aligning healthcare, public health and social services: A scoping review of the role of purpose, governance, finance and data

“…At the front line, recommendations for implementers, care coordinators and data managers included avoiding overwork and offering training (Higuchi et al., 2017 ; Ho et al., 2019 ; Holland et al., 2019 ). Co‐location was recommended in some cases (Hunt, 2019 ), but its effectiveness was viewed with scepticism by others, especially where there are not added directives and incentives for collaboration (Kousgaard et al., 2019 ; Scheele & Vrangbaek, 2016 ).…”

Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams

“…Danish FACT teams use treatment plans to create a common vision with inpatient care [ 60 ]. Having a common vision may promote collaboration [ 74 75 ] and integration of care [ 24 25 28 75 ], and common treatment plans may promote collaboration [ 49 ]. This suggests that the opportunities for integration may be enhanced if FACT teams invite patients and other services to participate in developing treatment plans.…”

Factors influencing delivery of intersectoral actions to address infant stunting in Bogotá, Colombia – a mixed methods case study.

“…Greer and Lillvis argue that obstacles for intersectoral governance are related to coordination and durability, and that solutions lye in enhanced political leadership, bureaucratic change, indirect strategies like expanding the range and capacity of people who access data including ordinary citizens (2). In the context of public-private partnerships of varying and separate organizational regulations, achieving appropriate intersectoral and interprofessional collaboration is complex, especially in private-public engagements (3,35). A first step for ISA resides in information quality and sharing among sectors, which is known as informative ISA (6).…”