2020
DOI: 10.1080/23297018.2019.1710723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-sectoral collaboration in the context of supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities who are frail

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of people with intellectual disabilities included in these studies were in receipt of a range of health and social care. Many of the studies set in Canada were focused on individuals specifically in receipt of community‐based care, or those who worked with or supported them (Ouellette‐Kuntz, Martin, & McKenzie, 2018; Ouellette‐Kuntz, Stankiewicz, et al, 2018; Martin et al, 2018, 2020; Barabash et al, 2021). Hippisley‐Cox and Coupland (2017) included people on primary care registers, but it is not known what other health or care services they were receiving.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of people with intellectual disabilities included in these studies were in receipt of a range of health and social care. Many of the studies set in Canada were focused on individuals specifically in receipt of community‐based care, or those who worked with or supported them (Ouellette‐Kuntz, Martin, & McKenzie, 2018; Ouellette‐Kuntz, Stankiewicz, et al, 2018; Martin et al, 2018, 2020; Barabash et al, 2021). Hippisley‐Cox and Coupland (2017) included people on primary care registers, but it is not known what other health or care services they were receiving.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin et al (2020) investigated facilitators and barriers to implementing one of the consensus statement recommendations ('intersectoral collaboration') when supporting individuals with intellectual disabilities who are frail. They found that factors relating to relationships with service providers were most mentioned by individuals with intellectual disabilities and their families, and that the presence of trust and respect between providers and service users was identified as important by service users, families and service providers.Regarding barriers to supporting individuals with an intellectual disability who are frail,Martin et al (2017) found that many of the participants within their knowledge transfer webinar did not feel T A B L E 4 Frailty measures used in the included studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relational aspect of nurses’ work was underpinned by knowing the person/client and engaging from a humanistic and caring perspective (Karlsson & Pennbrant, 2020). A major element within the positive interpersonal behaviour's domain was collaboration in the coordination and delivery of care through inter‐sectoral working (Ahlström et al, 2021; Martin et al, 2020). The clinical leadership and governance domain (10%) clearly highlighted the work of the nurse in the development of practice guidelines and policies and their integration into practice (O'Reilly et al, 2018) along with service plans/planning (Bertelli et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was housed within a larger study of collaboration between the health and developmental services sectors in Ontario, Canada (Martin et al, 2020), and was approved by the Lakehead University Research Ethics Board and the Queen's University Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%