2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.02.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-species investigation of the mechano-regulation of bone healing: Comparison of secondary bone healing in sheep and rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
88
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
88
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations have been reported before in a bone chamber study where no significant difference was found between the bone ingrowth rate in rats and goats [26]. In a recent study, a contradictory result has been reported where it has been proposed that bone healing process is probably different between rat and sheep [27]. While this species dependency of the parameters is not by itself a limitation of the proposed model, generalization of identified parameters between species should be verified by experimental data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Similar observations have been reported before in a bone chamber study where no significant difference was found between the bone ingrowth rate in rats and goats [26]. In a recent study, a contradictory result has been reported where it has been proposed that bone healing process is probably different between rat and sheep [27]. While this species dependency of the parameters is not by itself a limitation of the proposed model, generalization of identified parameters between species should be verified by experimental data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Specifically, the computational results reported in the literature are usually smaller in length and width compared to in vivo sizes. In fact, in silico dimensions are at best, 30% [36] and 19% [1] smaller than in vivo lengths and widths, respectively. In our study, the calluses are wider and lengthier and are thus more similar to in vivo dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In previous experimental studies 300 N, 500 N, 700 N and one and half times of body weight compressive loading have been suggested for bone healing. [26][27][28][29][30] In our study, it was possible to use 400 N compressive loading. In addition to this, 750 N loading was used to represent body weight and total load was equal to approximately one and half times of body weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%