2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2009.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-tablet coating variability: Tablet residence time variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
51
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were consistent with previous examinations on the sensitivity of DEM simulations which showed that variations in Young's modulus and shear modulus, respectively, did not impact the dynamic angle of repose (12,22). In contrast, an influence of the CoF on the dynamic angle of repose was seen (19,21).…”
Section: Dem Simulationsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were consistent with previous examinations on the sensitivity of DEM simulations which showed that variations in Young's modulus and shear modulus, respectively, did not impact the dynamic angle of repose (12,22). In contrast, an influence of the CoF on the dynamic angle of repose was seen (19,21).…”
Section: Dem Simulationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Ketterhagen demonstrated that an increase in shear moduli by the factor of 100 had no impact on the results of the simulation (12). For the DEM simulation of a coating process of biconvex tablets, the coefficient of sliding friction had a distinct effect on the inter-tablet coating variability as well as on the qualitative appearance of the bed behavior (going from slumping to rolling with increasing friction) (21). In an investigation on the formation of glass bead "sand piles," the angle of repose was significantly sensitive to variations on the friction, while it was not sensitive to elasticity parameters in both experiment and simulation (22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, it has been used to address the coating uniformity of pharmaceutical tablet coating in pan coaters [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. There are two critical parameters for the analysis of the coating variability: inter-and intra-particle coating variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two critical parameters for the analysis of the coating variability: inter-and intra-particle coating variability. The former is the variation in the average coating mass from a granule to another, whilst the latter is the distribution of coating liquid on the surfaces of individual granules, both of which can be quantified using the coefficient of variation [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-and intra particle coating variability are the two parameters for assessing the coating variability. The former is the variation in the average coating mass from a granule to another, whilst the latter is the distribution of coating liquid on the surfaces of individual granules, in which both M a n u s c r i p t factors can be quantied using the coecient of variation [6]. Inter particle coating variability is dened as the coecient of variation of the coating mass amongst the particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%