2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interacting multiple-models, state augmented Particle Filtering for fault diagnostics

Abstract: Particle Filtering (PF) is a model-based, filtering technique, which has drawn the attention of the Prognostic and Health Management (PHM) community due to its applicability to nonlinear models with non-additive and non-Gaussian noise. When multiple physical models can describe the evolution of the degradation of a component, the PF approach can be based on Multiple Swarms (MS) of particles, each one evolving according to a different model, from which to select the most accurate a posteriori distribution. Howe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IMM filter, which compared with other multiple model estimation algorithms, has attracted wide attention in virtue of their higher performance and lower computational cost [26,27]. Therefore, the IMM estimator has used to obtain the state estimates under various filters on the basis of the model probabilities in this research.…”
Section: Interacting Multiple Model Filter Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IMM filter, which compared with other multiple model estimation algorithms, has attracted wide attention in virtue of their higher performance and lower computational cost [26,27]. Therefore, the IMM estimator has used to obtain the state estimates under various filters on the basis of the model probabilities in this research.…”
Section: Interacting Multiple Model Filter Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integer part of x; that is, n ≤ x < n + 1, x ∈ R, n ∈ N. N (μ, σ 2 ) Normal distribution with mean μ and variance σ 2 . U (a, b) Uniform distribution between a and b. W(a, b) Weibull distribution with shape parameter a and scale parameter b; the cumulative density function (cdf) is F X (x) = 1 − e Point value summarizing the uncertainty in R λ (e.g., mean, median, 10th percentile, etc.…”
Section: δTmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, two detection metrics are widely used in practice: false positive probability (i.e., the probability of triggering undue alarms) and false negative probability (i.e., the probability of missing due alarms) ( [14], [15]). An additional detection metric is the detection time delay (DTD, [2]), which measures the interval from the time when the component reaches the detectable degradation state and its detection. We use this latter performance metric, motivated by a twofold justification: on one side, DTD can be regarded as a timedependent false negative indicator (i.e., alarms are certainly missing up to DTD); on the other side, the DTD values depend on the detection algorithm settings, which can be adjusted such that the false positive probability is negligible in the early phases of the component life ( [2]).…”
Section: Model Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many tracking methods based on the PDA algorithm have been successively developed [7,8]. The interacting multiple model (IMM) algorithm is a wellknown filter for estimating the state of a maneuvering target, and its modified methods are broadly utilized in various applications [9][10][11]. The combination of the PDA algorithm and IMM algorithm is usually utilized in single maneuvering target tracking [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%