2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.02.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interacting Stoner–Wohlfarth behavior in hysteresis curves of Sm(CoFeCuZr)z magnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…H is the applied field, H A is the anisotropy field, M is magnetization and M S is the magnetization of saturation and (1/d) is the CLC particle interaction parameter [10,11]. h SW refers to the isotropic hysteresis presented by Stoner and Wohlfarth for phases with uniaxial anisotropy [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…H is the applied field, H A is the anisotropy field, M is magnetization and M S is the magnetization of saturation and (1/d) is the CLC particle interaction parameter [10,11]. h SW refers to the isotropic hysteresis presented by Stoner and Wohlfarth for phases with uniaxial anisotropy [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…h SW refers to the isotropic hysteresis presented by Stoner and Wohlfarth for phases with uniaxial anisotropy [15]. In previous studies, it was found that (1/d) parameter is always positive [10,11], and this implies that the observed remanence was less than the half of saturation (M S ) predicted by the original SW model [15]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The more general anisotropic case has been also received attention and several very interesting works on this issue can be found in literature. This is the case of studies on the influence of the function f (ψ) on the magnetic parameters of the magnetization curve [22,23], description of systems with biaxial anisotropy [29,30], with distribution of magnetic moment of particles [31] or of anisotropy strength [24,25,32,33], as well as investigations of systems considering interactions between the particles through a mean field [24,25,[34][35][36][37] or taking into account temperature effects [38][39][40][41]. On the other hand, just a few studies compare numerical calculations and experimental results, probably due to the fact that the determination of the appropriate magnetic free energy density can represent a hard task.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%