14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/re.2006.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction Analysis in Aspect-Oriented Models

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For such detection, typically the UML models are transformed into graphs which are then analyzed to look for interactions. This approach is also advocated by Ciraci et al [9] and Mehner et al [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For such detection, typically the UML models are transformed into graphs which are then analyzed to look for interactions. This approach is also advocated by Ciraci et al [9] and Mehner et al [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, other approaches employ technologies such as program slicing [14], graph transformation [15,16] and semantics annotation [17] to detect the aspect interactions in AOSD. The approach in [14] uses programming slicing to detect the influences between aspects.…”
Section: B Implementing the Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach in [14] uses programming slicing to detect the influences between aspects. The graph transformation based approach in [15] is to analyze potential inconsistencies caused by aspect composition. The graph transformation based approach in [16] can detect aspect interference at shared join points.…”
Section: B Implementing the Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current version of Theme/UML, sequence diagrams are used to specify when and how the templates interact with the base themes. However, composition relationships could equally be visualized using any of UML's standard behavioral diagrams including collaboration [Mehner et al 2006], activity [Cui et al 2009], and state [Cottenier et al 2007a] diagrams. The choice of behavioral diagram to capture theme composition relationships depends largely on how behavior is modeled within individual themes.…”
Section: Theme/umlmentioning
confidence: 99%