1979
DOI: 10.1128/iai.24.3.720-728.1979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between 6/94 virus, a parainfluenza type 1 strain, and mouse macrophages

Abstract: The 6/94 virus, a type 1 parainfluenza virus recovered from multiple sclerosis brain cells after lysolecithin-induced fusion of these cells with African green monkey kidney cells (CV-1), has been found to grow in splenic and peritoneal macrophages obtained from outbred and different strains of inbred mice. Macrophages from C57BL animals were least susceptible to infection, a resistance apparently partially age related. The virus also has been found to replicate in IC21 cells, a line of simian virus 40 virus-tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Susceptibility of lymphocytes from immunized mice to infection. The immunization of mice with 6/94 virus and their humoral antibody responses as well as the susceptibility of their macrophages to infection with the same virus have been reported (11). Lymphocytes from the same immunized and normal mice were infected with 6/94 egg-grown virus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Susceptibility of lymphocytes from immunized mice to infection. The immunization of mice with 6/94 virus and their humoral antibody responses as well as the susceptibility of their macrophages to infection with the same virus have been reported (11). Lymphocytes from the same immunized and normal mice were infected with 6/94 egg-grown virus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Infection was carried out by incubating the cellvirus mixtures at 370C for 1 to 2 h and discarding the unadsorbed inoculum by a series of centrifugations and washings in phosphate-buffered saline, so that less than 10' TCID50 (50% tissue culture infective dose) was calculated to remain in the last supernatant fluid. In some experiments, residual virus was neutralized by incubating the washed inoculated cells with specific antiserum as described for macrophage infections (11). The dosage of virus used for inoculation varied with the experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The assumption could be made, therefore, that the variability of results in our experiments was due to unavoidable contamination of lymphocytes which produced cross-reacting, non-neutralizing antibodies. On the other hand, reports have been presented showing that multiplication of viruses, such as vaccinia (24), Semliki Forest (28), influenza (27), and parainfluenza (30) viruses, is suppressed in macrophage cultures from immunized animals. The discrepancies may be due to differences in the virus species used, or more likely, to differences in methods of immunization, in particular, homotypic or heterotypic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%