2003
DOI: 10.1021/bk-2004-0864.ch018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between Cellulose and Xylan: An Atomic Force Microscope and Quartz Crystal Microbalance Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One major advantage of using xylan in pulp fibre modification is the inherent affinity of xylan to cellulose, yielding an irreversible adsorption (Paananen et al 2004). However, the level of xylan-cellulose interaction has been shown to depend on xylan molecular structure (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major advantage of using xylan in pulp fibre modification is the inherent affinity of xylan to cellulose, yielding an irreversible adsorption (Paananen et al 2004). However, the level of xylan-cellulose interaction has been shown to depend on xylan molecular structure (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent review (Kontturi et al 2006) cellulose model surfaces for different purposes were discussed. QCM-D has been successfully used together with cellulose model surfaces to study the adsorption of wood components (Paananen et al 2004;Tammelin et al 2007) and cationic polyelectrolytes Salmi et al 2003) on cellulose. In addition, QCM-D has been utilized to study swelling of cellulose model surfaces (Fält et al 2003;Tammelin et al 2006) and dynamics of enzymatic activity on cellulose (Jeong et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons commonly used to describe the interactions between xylans and cellulose include co-crystallization (Meller 1965) hydrogen bonding (Buchert et al 1995), and aggregation of the xylans in solution prior to adsorption (Linder et al 2003;Westbye et al 2006). However, direct comparisons with the present study are difficult as research has shown the interactions are dependent upon pH and salt content (Paananen et al 2004;Danielsson and Lindström 2005;Ribe et al 2010a, b), degree of substitution by glucoronic acid, acetyl groups and arabinose (Kabel et al 2007), hydrophobic substituents , and lignin as lignin-carbohydrate complexes (Westbye et al 2007, Gradwell et al 2004, Winter et al 2006. Moreover, the adsorption is also influenced by characteristics of the substrate such as porosity, surface area, crystallinity and chemical composition (Linder and Gatenholm 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%