Interaction Between Information and Communication Technologies and Travel Behavior: Using Behavioral Data to Explore Correlates of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in providing virtual engagement. Planners and engineers must determine whether cities will see reductions in travel demand, given the increasing use of ICTs. Notably, ICTs facilitate online shopping and working from home (WFH). Generally, online shopping may lead to fewer shopping trips; similarly, WFH may reduce work-related trips. However, more WFH has the potential to generate other non-work trips, including shopping trips. To find answers and explore interdependencies, this study integrates pre-pandemic behavioral data with during-pandemic travel data. In our framework, WFH and online shopping are considered together. By harnessing the pre-pandemic 2017 National Household Travel Survey data, this study jointly analyzes the relationships between shopping trips, online shopping, and WFH with a conditional mixed process model that can address unobserved endogeneity and selection bias. The results suggest that, before the pandemic, online shopping was associated with fewer in-person shopping trips while WFH was associated with more shopping trips. The role of socio-demographic, locational, and travel-related factors is also explored. The during-pandemic data and analysis capture how COVID-19 affected travel behavior. Results show that the relationships among the key variables found in the pre-pandemic data are similar but differ in magnitude from during the pandemic. WFH increased from 12% to 61% during COVID-19, admittedly an unusual situation. In the next “new normal,” planners may improve travel demand models by treating WFH explicitly as an alternative to traveling to work in the trip generation and time of day models.

“Quantifying the implications of behavioral changes induced by digitalization on energy transition: A systematic review of methodological approaches”

“…The analysis of a travel survey confirmed that online shopping reduces the number of shopping trips (changed practice effect) [57,58], but it does not increase the number of non-shopping trips (no rebound effect) [58]. Although online shopping can foster the consumption of digital services and travel (induction rebound effect), as discovered by the analysis of an online-survey by Frick and Matthies [59].…”

Geographic disparities and predictors of COVID-19 vaccination in Missouri: a retrospective ecological study

“…The observed low proportions of COVID-19 vaccinated population in non-metropolitan communities in the southern part of the state might be due to inadequate healthcare facilities in these rural areas (23). Previous studies indicated that rural communities had higher burdens of diseases in general but lower access to healthcare resources than urban communities (35)(36)(37)(38)(39). According to a report by the Missouri Department of Health, counties in the southern part of the state tended to have fewer healthcare centers and primary care providers than the state average (40).…”

Identifying Pandemic Era Consumer Trends: Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Posts

“…Online purchasing, commonly called e-shopping or e-commerce, has significantly expanded recently. However, online sales experienced a remarkable surge during the COVID-19 pandemic (Ma et al, 2022;Patwary & Khattak, 2022). 'Online shopping' has burgeoned, with consumers seeking the breadth of selection and the convenience of home delivery that online platforms offer.…”