1956
DOI: 10.1002/jez.1401320203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction between limb bud ectoderm and mesoderm in the chick embryo. III. Experiments with polydactylous limbs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concentration of the morphogen is lowest at the earliest stages of blastema formation, so proximal identities will be specified first. The blastema cells produce an apical epidermal maintenance factor (AEMF; see Zwilling and Hansborough, 1956) that controls production of the PD morphogen by the AEC. More distally determined cells produce more AEMF, resulting in a higher concentration of PD morphogen.…”
Section: Models Of Pattern Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of the morphogen is lowest at the earliest stages of blastema formation, so proximal identities will be specified first. The blastema cells produce an apical epidermal maintenance factor (AEMF; see Zwilling and Hansborough, 1956) that controls production of the PD morphogen by the AEC. More distally determined cells produce more AEMF, resulting in a higher concentration of PD morphogen.…”
Section: Models Of Pattern Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chick embryos permit manipulation of the developing limb in vitro or through a window in the egg shell in vivo. Saunders' two key experiments on limb development in the chick showed that the removal of the apical ectodermal ridge (AER), a narrow band of specialized ectodermal cells located at the tip of the growing bud [4], caused distal truncations in the limb [5], and that the grafting of the posterior zone of polarizing activity (ZPA) to the anterior margin led to the development of additional digits [6]. These experiments defined the cell interactions in the developing limb that control growth and patterning along each of the three limb axes, and led to the formulation of various models of these interactions [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introduction and Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hindlimb bones were more frequently involved and the most affected part was the distal end of the extremities, i.e., the phalanges. Since the skeletal differentiation in the limbs, i.e., mesodermal condensation, chondrification and ossification, proceeds in a proximodistal sequence in general (Zwilling & Hansborough 1956, Amprino 1965, Milaire 1965, the suppressive effect of mitomycin on the proliferating and differentiating mesenchyme (Singh et al 1974) is likely to depend on the stage of differentiation of the limb buds at the time of the administration of the drug. The skeletal elements which differentiate at an early stage will be more resistant than those which differentiate later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%