IntroductionFinding an acceptable and effective method of contraception is problematic for many women, even more so for those taking concurrent enzyme-inducing medication. This group presents a particular challenge and can also be the cause of confusion among prescribers in this situation where a high degree of contraceptive protection is often a key requirement. Copper intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs) may be inappropriate if there is a history of menorrhagia, barrier methods may not be acceptable to either or both partners, and oral contraceptives (OCs) carry the risk of drug interactions and hence reduced efficacy, 1 though not all anticonvulsants are enzyme-inducers. 2,3 In the presence of enzyme-inducers, even increasing the oestrogen dose in combined OCs, tri-cycling, and/or decreasing the pill-free interval give no guarantee of protection, though such measures may reduce the risk of accidental pregnancies. Comparative data on OC efficacy in women taking enzyme-inducers versus those not taking such medication are sparse, though numerous anecdotal reports suggest a higher risk in the former. 4-7 Surveys of healthcare professionals 8 and women suffering from epilepsy 9 have clearly demonstrated the need for better information, particularly with regard to the risk of drug interactions.A possibly more suitable option for women on enzymeinducers might be the hormone-releasing intrauterine system (IUS) Mirena ® . This can be true even for nulliparous women, with appropriate counselling and skilled insertion. The IUS has various modes of action: thickening of the cervical mucus and local inflammatory effects in the uterine cavity impairs sperm migration through the uterus; ovulation is inhibited to various degrees during treatment time in 25-55% of women; and the endometrium is suppressed.In women not taking enzyme-inducers Mirena ® is a highly effective contraceptive with a failure rate of only two pregnancies per 1000 women per year. Whether this exceptionally high level of efficacy also applies to women on enzyme-inducers is at present unknown. In theory, drug interaction is not impossible since some of the progestogen released enters the general circulation. Conversely, there is direct local release leading to high levonorgestrel concentrations in the endometrium and the utero-tubocervical fluid, hence contraceptive protection from the local mechanisms is unlikely to be reduced by enzyme-inducers acting at the liver.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL ARTICLE