2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of arsenic with biochar in soil and water: A critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
92
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
4
92
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sasmita et al [31] made similar observation in a 15-day incubation experiment using rice husk biochar and attributed the reduction in the soil exchangeable Al to the liming effect from biochar. Also, the reduction of the exchangeable H + + Al 3+ content by biochar could be due to the formation of Al complex by the oxidized organic functional groups such as carboxylic and phenolic at the biochar surface as pointed out by Vithanage et al [35].…”
Section: Soil Exchangeable Bases and Exchangeable Aciditymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Sasmita et al [31] made similar observation in a 15-day incubation experiment using rice husk biochar and attributed the reduction in the soil exchangeable Al to the liming effect from biochar. Also, the reduction of the exchangeable H + + Al 3+ content by biochar could be due to the formation of Al complex by the oxidized organic functional groups such as carboxylic and phenolic at the biochar surface as pointed out by Vithanage et al [35].…”
Section: Soil Exchangeable Bases and Exchangeable Aciditymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Variations in temperature and heating duration caused complex and non-linear behavior of As(III) aq and As(V) aq . This likely reflects the varying extent and form(s) of As species incorporation/retention in char residues (Vithanage et al, 2017), contrasting effects of changes in pH (Dixit and Hering, 2003), competing interactions between solid-phase As(V) reduction/re-oxidation, as well as changes in the magnitude of As Ex formation.…”
Section: Enhanced Mobilization Of As(iii) On Re-wettingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the terms of environmental remediation, Chen et al (2008) systemically investigated the sorption of organic pollutants by biochar pyrolysis at different temperatures, and they found that the adsorption mechanisms of biochars were evolved from partitioning-dominant at low pyrolytic temperatures to adsorption-dominant at higher pyrolytic temperatures. Since then, many studies have been conducted to investigate the adsorption performance, adsorption mechanism and influencing factors of biochar as adsorbent to remove a wide range of pollutants, such as heavy metals (Cao et al 2009;Vithanage et al 2017;Wang et al 2015c;Wu et al 2018;Zhu et al 2017a), radioactive elements (Chen et al 2019b;Pang et al 2019), nitrogen and phosphorus (Chen et al 2011;Inyang et al 2015), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (Huang et al 2019;Sun et al 2011), dyes (Qiu et al 2009), pesticides (Tang et al 2016), phthalic acid esters (Lu and Chen 2020;Zhang et al 2016), and pharmaceuticals (Frohlich et al 2019). Generally, the physical and chemical properties of biochar are largely affected by feedstock, carbonization methods (i.e., slow pyrolysis, fast pyrolysis, flash pyrolysis, pyrolytic gasification, hydrothermal treatment, and microwave carbonization), and pyrolysis parameters (i.e., temperature, holding time, and heating rate) (Cheah et al 2014;Chen et al 2015;Chu et al 2017;Lee et al 2010;Martin et al 2019;Uchimiya et al 2015;Wen et al 2017;Xiao et al 2014;Xu and Chen 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%