2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11090-019-10008-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of CH4 with Electronically Excited O2: Ab Initio Potential Energy Surfaces and Reaction Kinetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To additionally verify the accuracy of calculated values of E a + (a) and E a + (b) energy barriers, the compound G3MP2, G4MP2, and CBS-QB3 methods, based on a sequence of predefined ab initio molecular orbital calculations and involving special empirical corrections to ensure high target accuracy, were employed. Note that these composite techniques were chosen for comparative analysis because they had previously been proved to be effective in determining energy barriers on the excited PESs. ,,,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To additionally verify the accuracy of calculated values of E a + (a) and E a + (b) energy barriers, the compound G3MP2, G4MP2, and CBS-QB3 methods, based on a sequence of predefined ab initio molecular orbital calculations and involving special empirical corrections to ensure high target accuracy, were employed. Note that these composite techniques were chosen for comparative analysis because they had previously been proved to be effective in determining energy barriers on the excited PESs. ,,,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that these composite techniques were chosen for comparative analysis because they had previously been proved to be effective in determining energy barriers on the excited PESs. 94,108,109,153,154 One can see that the use of modern higher-level methods in general leads to some decrease in the entrance energy barriers on the 2 A′ and 4 A′ PESs compared with early data by Walch and Jaffe. 17 with CASPT2 calculations 37 giving the lowest E a + (a) value [aside from the zero value obtained by Starik et al 44 during the plain CASSCF calculations with apparently insufficient (9,7) active space].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Nascent Energymentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notice that this variant of AHO approximation, despite some simplifying assumptions made, such as neglecting the quartic vibrational anharmonicity and mode-mode coupling, shows a tolerable accuracy for polyatomic species of different elemental composition. 14,58,115–117…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%