1982
DOI: 10.1016/0198-0149(82)90001-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of currents and vertical migration in maintaining Calanus marshallae in the Oregon upwelling zone—a simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the MLC model (Botsford et al 2003(Botsford et al , 2006 zooplankton are assumed to have no migratory behavior, in which case optimal conditions for secondary production are achieved for variability in wind forcing on time scales comparable to those of the organisms, but much longer than observed wind variability. This model result argues that, in reality, longer-lived zooplankton populations counter the potential advective loss of shelf productivity through ontogenetic behavior (e.g., Peterson et al 1979) or diel vertical migration behavior (Wroblewski 1982;Peterson 1998).…”
Section: Zooplankton Populationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the MLC model (Botsford et al 2003(Botsford et al , 2006 zooplankton are assumed to have no migratory behavior, in which case optimal conditions for secondary production are achieved for variability in wind forcing on time scales comparable to those of the organisms, but much longer than observed wind variability. This model result argues that, in reality, longer-lived zooplankton populations counter the potential advective loss of shelf productivity through ontogenetic behavior (e.g., Peterson et al 1979) or diel vertical migration behavior (Wroblewski 1982;Peterson 1998).…”
Section: Zooplankton Populationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the necessary observations and understanding of depth selection and foraging behavior in marine zooplankton are extremely limited. Thus, for example, modeling studies of mesozooplankton population dynamics embedded in multidimensional ocean circulation schemes repeatedly identify controls of vertical distribution and migration behavior (that is, depth selection) by individual zooplankters as essential information that is usually unknown (Batchelder et al 2002;Hannah et al 1997;Miller et al 1998;Reiss et al 2003;Werner et al 1993;Wroblewski 1982;Zakardjian et al 2003). Recent modeling work suggests that small-scale behaviors such as foraging may indeed have a large impact on the transport of zooplankters (Woodson and McManus 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have also addressed the effect of advection combined with DVM on the distribution (dispersal or retention) of zooplankton whereby the organisms take advantage of horizontal currents with vertically varying speeds and directions during their upward and downward movements (Hardy and Gunther, 1935;Wroblewski, 1982;Manuel and O'Dor, 1997;Eiane et al, 1998;Krägefsky, 2008;Krägefsky et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%