2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of delaminations and matrix cracks in a CFRP plate, Part II: Simulation using an enriched shell finite element model

Abstract: Numerical simulations are presented of a recently developed test which creates multiple delaminations in a CFRP laminate specimen that grow and interact via transverse matrix cracks [1]. A novel shell element enriched with the Floating Node Method, and a damage algorithm based on the Virtual Crack Closure Technique, were used to successfully simulate the tests. Additionally, a 3D high mesh fidelity model based on cohesive zones and continuum damage mechanics was used to simulate the tests and act as a represen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 However, to simulate general delamination growth, the VCCT requires coupling with an additional strategy, such as re-meshing. 5,6 Alternatively, the delamination can be assumed to always conform to the underlying mesh, [7][8][9] and delamination growth can be simulated by releasing node pairs along the delamination front. Such a strategy [10][11][12][13] typically leads to artificial stress concentrations requiring corrections such as proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 However, to simulate general delamination growth, the VCCT requires coupling with an additional strategy, such as re-meshing. 5,6 Alternatively, the delamination can be assumed to always conform to the underlying mesh, [7][8][9] and delamination growth can be simulated by releasing node pairs along the delamination front. Such a strategy [10][11][12][13] typically leads to artificial stress concentrations requiring corrections such as proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%