1998
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1998.5688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of Different Types of Cells on Polymer Surfaces with Wettability Gradient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
332
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 444 publications
(353 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
16
332
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface wettability can be altered in many ways such as plasma treatment, surface coating, introduction of hydrophilic or hydrophobic groups by self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) 11,12,14,[22][23][24][25][26] . Among these methods, plasma treatment (radio frequency glow discharge) has a long history of modifying surface wettability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surface wettability can be altered in many ways such as plasma treatment, surface coating, introduction of hydrophilic or hydrophobic groups by self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) 11,12,14,[22][23][24][25][26] . Among these methods, plasma treatment (radio frequency glow discharge) has a long history of modifying surface wettability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of studies indicated that cells tended to attach onto hydrophilic surfaces than onto hydrophobic surfaces [6][7][8][9][10] . On the other hand, it has been reported that cells adhered and proliferated at the highest rate when cultured on a substrate with hydrophobic surfaces 11 or a contact angle of around 70 degrees, and cell adhesion and proliferation rates were lower on more hydrophilic or more hydrophobic surfaces 3,12,13 . These confusing results were considered to be based on the different materials used, different surface topographies employed, and the narrow ranges of surface wettability employed 11,14,15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the Ti substrates coated with collagen/HA nanocomposite coatings were considered to be more promising than the collagen-coated Ti equivalents in the bone regeneration field. When comparing the nanocomposite coatings, the cells on the COL-30%HA coatings exhibited a lower proliferation level than those on the COL-20%HA coatings, and this was partially due to the relatively rougher and more hydrophobic surface of the former [27,28].…”
Section: In Vitro Evaluation Of Cell Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its importance in the design of implantable scaffolds was first reported by Weiss in 1960, 16 later confirmed by many others. 5,[17][18][19][20][21][22] Since cells effectively adhered onto polymer surfaces with moderate wettability as demonstrated by water contact angles of 40-70 degress, [23][24][25][26][27] it is clear that the wettability of a biomaterial surface plays a critical role in cell attachment and proliferation. [28][29][30] In addition, it has been shown that most human bone marrow stromal cells attached to hydrophobic (HP) surfaces had smaller surface contact areas, resulting in a more rounded cell morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%