1990
DOI: 10.1016/0193-3973(90)90028-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of early biological and family risk factors in predicting cognitive development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, mothers from low sociodemographic environments are probably most in need of and responsive to early intervention services. Such results are consistent with risk models indicating powerful effects of environmental risk factors in moderating the effects of biological risk (Escalona, 1984(Escalona, , 1987Ricciuti & Scarr, 1990;Sameroff, Seifer, Barocas, Zax, & Creenspan, 1987).…”
Section: Spiker Ferguson and Brooks-gnnn 761supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Thus, mothers from low sociodemographic environments are probably most in need of and responsive to early intervention services. Such results are consistent with risk models indicating powerful effects of environmental risk factors in moderating the effects of biological risk (Escalona, 1984(Escalona, , 1987Ricciuti & Scarr, 1990;Sameroff, Seifer, Barocas, Zax, & Creenspan, 1987).…”
Section: Spiker Ferguson and Brooks-gnnn 761supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The interactional effect between birth weight and parental sensitivity on the general intellectual level was nonsignificant. A significant interaction effect between biological and psychosocial risk on the general intellectual level has been found in other studies (Escalona, 1982;Ricciuti & Scarr, 1990), although the findings are not consistent (Saigal, Szatmari, Rosenbaum, Campbell & King, 1991;Wolke & Meyer, 1999). Parental sensitivity, however, was highly potent in explaining part of the variance of the general cognitive index that was left unexplained by traditional psychosocial variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Several investigators have shown that the compounding of risk conditions in poverty environments has negative in uences on children's physical, mental, and social developmen t (e.g., Margolis, Greenberg, & Keyes, 1992;Ricciuti & Scarr, 1990;Sameroff, Seifer, Barocas, Zax, & Greenspan, 1987;Wasik, Ramey, Bryant, & Sparling, 1990). ''T he chronic stress and diminished material and psychological resources that often characterize poverty environments combine in synergistic fashion to the detriment of young children'' (Bradley et al, 1994 , p. 347).…”
Section: Language Development Of Children Reared In Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%