2004
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-817882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of Flooding with Carbon Metabolism of Forest Trees

Abstract: Waterlogging and flooding cause oxygen deprivation in the root system of trees. Since oxygen is essentially for mitochondrial respiration, this process cannot be maintained under anoxic conditions and must be replaced by other pathways. For the roots it is therefore a matter of survival to switch from respiration to alcoholic fermentation. Due to the low efficiency of this process to yield energy equivalents (ATP), energy and carbon metabolism of trees are usually strongly affected by oxygen deprivation, even … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
111
1
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
4
111
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Q. ilex, a typical Mediterranean tree species generally experiencing rather water limitations than flooding conditions, has been reported to exhibit extremely high ethanol and acetaldehyde emission rates when exposed to flooding (Holzinger et al, 2000). These rates (∼15 000 and 4000 nmol m −2 min −1 of acetaldehyde and ethanol, respectively) were larger than those observed for the flooding tolerant Amazonian trees species in the present study (3-200 nmol and 42-4220 nmol m −2 min −1 of acetaldehyde and ethanol, respectively) and much larger than those for flooding tolerant and intolerant European tree species (∼100-1000 nmol m −2 min −1 acetaldehyde) (Kreuzwieser et al, 2004). Hence, not the flooding tolerance itself, but different physiological mechanisms contributing to a flooding tolerance determine the emission rates of ethanol and its oxidation products and emissions rates alone can not be used as indicators a flooding tolerance.…”
Section: Emissions Carbon Budget and Flooding Tolerancecontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, Q. ilex, a typical Mediterranean tree species generally experiencing rather water limitations than flooding conditions, has been reported to exhibit extremely high ethanol and acetaldehyde emission rates when exposed to flooding (Holzinger et al, 2000). These rates (∼15 000 and 4000 nmol m −2 min −1 of acetaldehyde and ethanol, respectively) were larger than those observed for the flooding tolerant Amazonian trees species in the present study (3-200 nmol and 42-4220 nmol m −2 min −1 of acetaldehyde and ethanol, respectively) and much larger than those for flooding tolerant and intolerant European tree species (∼100-1000 nmol m −2 min −1 acetaldehyde) (Kreuzwieser et al, 2004). Hence, not the flooding tolerance itself, but different physiological mechanisms contributing to a flooding tolerance determine the emission rates of ethanol and its oxidation products and emissions rates alone can not be used as indicators a flooding tolerance.…”
Section: Emissions Carbon Budget and Flooding Tolerancecontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Taking into account that L. corymbulosa is also an isoprene emitting species (unpublished data), the total C-loss through emissions of volatile organic compounds might be quite substantial. Kreuzwieser et al (2004) hypothesized from their observations on European tree species that an effective carbon recycling of root derived ethanol inside plant leaves can be regarded as an important mechanism of flooding tolerance. Within this context a high emission rate of acetaldehyde may indicate a high metabolic turnover of ethanol in the leaves and an increased flooding tolerance.…”
Section: Emissions Carbon Budget and Flooding Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees in tropical areas with seasonal floods have a similar response (Rengifo et al, 2005), with a reduction in photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance, but an accumulation of starch in leaves. The accumulation of starch and sugars in leaves compromises photosynthetic efficiency due to feedback-inhibition (Kreuzwieser et al, 2004;Dalberto et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation in the activation or action of Rubisco, imbalances in the Calvin cycle, or even feedback-inhibition due to sugar accumulation may have occurred, resulting in this decrease. Feedback-inhibition by the accumulation of photoassimilates is commonly observed in plants with roots under hypoxia (Kreuzwieser et al, 2004;Rengifo et al, 2005). Regardless of the form of photosynthetic inhibition, excess light energy must be adequately dissipated or it may cause cell damage (Carvalho and Amancio, 2002;AbdElgawad et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stomatal closure contributes to the preservation of leaf water potential, and decreasing the reduction of hydraulic conductivity of roots (Kreuzwieser et al, 2004). Thus, the stomatal closure, the reducing evaporation, and the maintenance of leaf water potential are strategies developed by plants in waterlogged conditions to minimize water loss (Davanso et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%