1989
DOI: 10.1021/bi00442a009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of melittin with mixed phospholipid membranes composed of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine and dimyristoylphosphatidylserine studied by deuterium NMR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
47
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the absence of any effect of bound spectrin on the quadrupolar splittings and Ti relaxation times indicates that no significant change in the DMPS-d3 conformation or dynamics of the DMPS head group are induced by the protein, even with a large amount of spectrin (23 wt% = 0.39 x 10m3 mol%) that is similar to the physiological spectrin-lipid ratio (1O-3 mol%) [7] in the inner leaflet of the erythrocyte membrane. This result can be compared with other deuterium NMR studies of the interaction between PS and various proteins [20][21][22]301, which show that positively charged proteins which do not penetrate within the bilayer have detectable (though weak) effects on the conformation of PS head group [20,21]. Proteins which are both charged and able to penetrate into the membrane surface have a much larger effect on the conformation of PS head group [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the absence of any effect of bound spectrin on the quadrupolar splittings and Ti relaxation times indicates that no significant change in the DMPS-d3 conformation or dynamics of the DMPS head group are induced by the protein, even with a large amount of spectrin (23 wt% = 0.39 x 10m3 mol%) that is similar to the physiological spectrin-lipid ratio (1O-3 mol%) [7] in the inner leaflet of the erythrocyte membrane. This result can be compared with other deuterium NMR studies of the interaction between PS and various proteins [20][21][22]301, which show that positively charged proteins which do not penetrate within the bilayer have detectable (though weak) effects on the conformation of PS head group [20,21]. Proteins which are both charged and able to penetrate into the membrane surface have a much larger effect on the conformation of PS head group [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The presence of charged lipids such as DMPS [28], of ions [36] or of charged anaesthetics [37] near the deuterated head group of DMPC strongly modifies its conformation, as a result of the perturbation of the bilayer surface charge [43]. Partial neutralization or screening of DMPS charges by positive charges at the membrane surface allows the DMPC head group to recover its original conformation [22]. Neutralization of the surface potential resulting from DMPS negative charges, by segmental positive charges on spectrin, thus seems to be precluded by our negative result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even small variations in its geometrical orientation, however, caused by the peptide interaction would gener- ate a component in a direction normal to the membrane plane and is likely to affect significantly the magnitude of the dipole potential. In fact, studies with melittin have shown how the peptide is able to modify the orientation of the P Ϫ -N ϩ dipole (42)(43)(44). On the other hand, if part of the peptide inserts into the membrane, as described above, forming an obliquely oriented helix (26), then the direct effect of the dipolar moment of the helix must influence the membrane dipole potential.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well documented that the presence of negatively charged lipids in membranes, such as phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylserine (PS), and phosphatidic acid (PA), significantly increases the melittin affinity due to attractive electrostatic interactions [38][39][40][41][42] . However, it was observed that melittin-induced bicellization of membranes was strongly hindered by the presence of anionic lipids in membranes 26,38,40,[43][44] . This observation was proposed to be due to an electrostatic anchoring of the peptide to the interface, preventing the relocation of the peptide deeper in the hydrophobic core, an essential step for the membrane fragmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%