2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-33774-2_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of Nanoparticles with Reservoir Fluids and Rocks for Enhanced Oil Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stable microemulsion formed in the presence of NPs with various surfactants helps to achieve the ultralow IFT of an oil–water system . NPs can influence the IFT of the oil–water system under high salinity and high temperature conditions. , This could be due to their high surface-to-volume ratio, which enables them to possess a high adsorption affinity to interact at the interface of the fluid–fluid system actively. , The surface-active silica NPs could reduce IFT of the oil–water system up to nearly 61% at 1 wt % to 0.001 wt % of NPs in the base fluid . This indicates that the concentration of NPs in the base fluid plays a crucial role in influencing the interfacial properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stable microemulsion formed in the presence of NPs with various surfactants helps to achieve the ultralow IFT of an oil–water system . NPs can influence the IFT of the oil–water system under high salinity and high temperature conditions. , This could be due to their high surface-to-volume ratio, which enables them to possess a high adsorption affinity to interact at the interface of the fluid–fluid system actively. , The surface-active silica NPs could reduce IFT of the oil–water system up to nearly 61% at 1 wt % to 0.001 wt % of NPs in the base fluid . This indicates that the concentration of NPs in the base fluid plays a crucial role in influencing the interfacial properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the NF-B sample with the smallest size (32 nm) reduced the IFT by 71.8% compared to the 36.9% reduction by the largest NF-C sample. This can be associated with the increase in repulsive forces between the smallest NPs, resulting in a greater disjoining pressure between the two-phase molecules [ 38 ]. In addition, the IFT reduction can be due to the surface-active polymer molecules surrounding the surface of the NPs that provide steric repulsive forces and stabilization of the NPs suspension.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the NF-B sample with the smallest size (32 nm) reduced the IFT by 71.8% compared to the 36.9% reduction by the largest NF-C sample. This can be associated with the increase in repulsive forces between the smallest NPs, resulting in a greater disjoining pressure between the two-phase molecules [38]. In addition, www.videleaf.com the IFT reduction can be due to the surface-active polymer molecules surrounding the surface of the NPs that provide steric repulsive forces and stabilization of the NPs suspension.…”
Section: Reduction In Interfacial Tension (Ift)mentioning
confidence: 99%