2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00214-016-1846-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of octahedral Mg(II) and tetrahedral Al(III) substitutions in aluminium-rich dioctahedral smectites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, these substitutions tend to be dispersed in the layer structure . Various arrangements of octahedral and tetrahedral substitutions in both tv and cv structures of 2:1 dioctahedral smectites and illites were examined by DFT calculations. Arrangements with dispersed Mg octahedral substitutions were energetically preferred, as were structures where Fe substitutions and Mg octahedral cations were not in close proximity in agreement with other studies. , Fe substitutions were shown to prefer neighboring positions to each other, confirming the segregation effect found earlier by means of Monte Carlo simulations . Energy differences between tv and cv structures were calculated as well, but no correlation was obtained between the number and type of cation substitutions on the one hand and the tv/cv preference on the other .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accordingly, these substitutions tend to be dispersed in the layer structure . Various arrangements of octahedral and tetrahedral substitutions in both tv and cv structures of 2:1 dioctahedral smectites and illites were examined by DFT calculations. Arrangements with dispersed Mg octahedral substitutions were energetically preferred, as were structures where Fe substitutions and Mg octahedral cations were not in close proximity in agreement with other studies. , Fe substitutions were shown to prefer neighboring positions to each other, confirming the segregation effect found earlier by means of Monte Carlo simulations . Energy differences between tv and cv structures were calculated as well, but no correlation was obtained between the number and type of cation substitutions on the one hand and the tv/cv preference on the other .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Monte Carlo simulations applying empirical interatomic potentials to smectite and Illite models with various arrangements of Al, Fe, and Mg cations in the octahedral sheet were carried out. It was shown that Mg cations are preferentially dispersed, whereas Fe cations tend to form either clusters or chains . Recently, Lavikainen and co-workers used the density functional theory (DFT) approach to study the interaction of octahedral and tetrahedral charged substitutions in tv dioctahedral smectites. Accordingly, these substitutions tend to be dispersed in the layer structure .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Substitution Energies for the Second Heteroatoms (E sub2 , kcal/mol), Their Differences from the First Substitution Energies (ΔE sub , kcal/mol), and Relative Energies (RE, kcal/mol) for the Double Substituted MMT Models as Well as Average K−O S Distances (R K−Os , Å), Charge Transfers (q tr , |e|), and Adsorption Energies (E ad , kcal/mol) for the Adsorption of K + on these MMT Models 3 and Figure 6). Priority is generally given to two T sites with larger distances; 25,28,53,54 3). In all cases, the K− O S distances of double substitutions are less than those of mono substitutions (both octahedral and tetrahedral, see Table 2) suggesting the reinforced adsorption.…”
Section: Double Substitutions In Mmtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the structures of MMTs are also influenced by different layer charge densities and layer charge distributions. For instance, the basal layer spacing and interlayer spacing can be affected by different layer charge densities and distributions (Peng et al, 2021) and the introduction of the substitutions generates structural tension to the layer structure leading to the structure expansion (Lavikainen et al, 2016). Since the anisotropic elastic properties of MMTs are strongly correlated with their structure (Zhong et al, 2021), the variation of structure may potentially cause a change in the anisotropic elastic properties of MMTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%