1991
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(91)90160-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of positively-charged liposomes with blood: implications for their application in vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Serum-induced inhibition of lipoplex-mediated transfection has been often reported. [25][26][27][28] However, the transfection ability of the SucPG-complex did not decrease even at a serum concentration of 40%. In contrast, the transfection activity of the plain lipoplex decreased slightly as serum concentration of the medium increased up to 20%, although its serum sensitivity was not significant.…”
Section: Figure 5 Luciferase Activity Of Hela Cells Treated With Tranmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Serum-induced inhibition of lipoplex-mediated transfection has been often reported. [25][26][27][28] However, the transfection ability of the SucPG-complex did not decrease even at a serum concentration of 40%. In contrast, the transfection activity of the plain lipoplex decreased slightly as serum concentration of the medium increased up to 20%, although its serum sensitivity was not significant.…”
Section: Figure 5 Luciferase Activity Of Hela Cells Treated With Tranmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[108,109] As a less toxic alternative to SA, the cationic compounds dimethyldioctadecylammonium bromide (DDAB) or 3β-(N(N 1 N 1 -dimethylaminoethane) carbamoyl) cholesterol (DC-chol) can also target several skin and oral bacteria via electrostatic interactions. [76,[78][79][80] DC-chol containing liposomes showed the most effective targeting towards S. epidermidis while DDAB was the least effective targeting agent.…”
Section: Non-specific Targetingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18] Furthermore, intravenously injected cationic DNA complexes also encounter unintended cell types such as macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, and erythrocytes, which are important potential mediators of toxicity. 9,19,20 Toxic manifestations of systemically administered cationic DNA complexes can range from red blood cell agglutination 21 to potent inflammatory reaction and elevated serum levels of liver enzymes. 9,22 Several studies have attempted to avoid such adverse interactions by including polyethyleneglycol (PEG) or proteins such as albumin or transferrin in the DNA complexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%