1964
DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0001091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of Shear Walls and Frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of model aims to account for both bending and shear deformations, and they were proposed to consider that lateral deformation in buildings is due to a combination of both flexural and shear deformations 25 . It has been shown that using only shear‐building models may result in significant errors when estimating the dynamic response of building structures, 26,27 and it is worth to note that this has also been the case in structures where the main lateral force resisting system is based on shear walls 28 …”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of model aims to account for both bending and shear deformations, and they were proposed to consider that lateral deformation in buildings is due to a combination of both flexural and shear deformations 25 . It has been shown that using only shear‐building models may result in significant errors when estimating the dynamic response of building structures, 26,27 and it is worth to note that this has also been the case in structures where the main lateral force resisting system is based on shear walls 28 …”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As higher-mode effects are identified as a significant design challenge for tall and slender structures, substantial studies have been conducted to systematically investigate the contribution of higher-mode effects in structures with various boundary conditions, by adapting modal analysis tools, [27][28][29][30] or by developing closed-form solutions by simplifying the structures using a continuum beam analogy. 10,[31][32][33][34] Results of these studies demonstrated that the dynamic response of tall and slender structures can be directly controlled by varying the degree of rotational and translational fixities at their bases-while limiting the base rotational fixity can effectively reduce the first-mode response, limiting the base translational fixity is more effective in mitigating the higher-mode responses. This suggested the possibility of utilizing a basemechanism that limits the overall dynamic response of the superstructure by controlling both the overturning moment (i.e., rotational fixity) and shear (i.e., translational fixity) demands at the structure's base.…”
Section: Mitigating Higher-mode Effects Using Base-mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The links represent the slabs that horizontally connect RC walls and frames; the links are treated as rigid members because of the extremely high in-plane stiffness of the slabs. CSFCBM was first proposed by Khan and Sbarounis (1964) to evaluate the interaction between walls and frames in multi-story buildings. The model was later used to identify approximate responses of multi-story buildings, such as lateral displacements and shear forces in walls, under various lateral load distributions (Heidebrecht and Smith 1973;Smith et al 1981Smith et al , 1984.…”
Section: Csfcbmmentioning
confidence: 99%