2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.10.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of Sp1 zinc finger with transport factor in the nuclear localization of transcription factor Sp1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using importin ␣5 deletion mutants, we found that broad regions of importin ␣5 associated with Snail but that the Arm repeat was predominant in the recognition of Snail (Fig. 3A), consistent with a previous report showing that the zinc finger-type transcription factor, SP1, has a similar binding property (34). Furthermore, the N-terminal half of importin ␤1, which contains the Ran binding domain, was mapped as the Snail-binding region (supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Using importin ␣5 deletion mutants, we found that broad regions of importin ␣5 associated with Snail but that the Arm repeat was predominant in the recognition of Snail (Fig. 3A), consistent with a previous report showing that the zinc finger-type transcription factor, SP1, has a similar binding property (34). Furthermore, the N-terminal half of importin ␤1, which contains the Ran binding domain, was mapped as the Snail-binding region (supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, the finger plays a role of the interface with the regulatory protein(s) [61]. SP1 is a well-characterized member of the SP/KLF family, and all three zinc fingers are essential for binding to importin alpha and contribute to nuclear localization [62]. Here, we identified a novel frameshift mutation caused by a 2-bp insertion in the Sp6 coding sequence, resulting in disruption of the third zinc finger domain with an addition of an unrelated 11 amino acids (Figure 1B,C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that virtually all cellular Cu is tightly bound, and intracellular Cu trafficking is carried out by Cu chaperones to different cellular compartments, i.e, CCS to superoxide dismutase in the cytoplasm [12], Cox17 to mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase, and Atox1 to two trans -Golgi P1B-type ATPases (ATP7A and ATP7B) [13]. It has been reported that ZF domain is involved in nuclear targeting of Sp1 [14]. However, our results from a cell-free system demonstrating that free Cu can affect Sp1-DNA binding suggest that regulation of Sp1-mediated transcriptional regulation by Cu may not need a carrier protein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%