1997
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction of the receptor binding domains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pili strains PAK, PAO, KB7 and P1 to a cross-reactive antibody and receptor analog: implications for synthetic vaccine design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) that has been implicated as the binding domain for the eukaryotic glycolipid asialoGM 1 (aGM 1 ). Previous studies of receptor binding using peptide mimics of the C-terminal DSLs of group II pilins from strains PAK, PAO1 and KB7 and the group I pilin from strain P1 showed that all peptides bound to aGM 1 despite differences in amino acid composition (Campbell et al, 1997). In contrast, a recent study (Schroeder et al, 2001) using whole, piliated cells showed that a number of clinical isolates (of undefined pilin type), as well as laboratory strains including PAO1 and PAK, did not demonstrate differences in binding to host cells in the presence or absence of exogenously added aGM 1 receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) that has been implicated as the binding domain for the eukaryotic glycolipid asialoGM 1 (aGM 1 ). Previous studies of receptor binding using peptide mimics of the C-terminal DSLs of group II pilins from strains PAK, PAO1 and KB7 and the group I pilin from strain P1 showed that all peptides bound to aGM 1 despite differences in amino acid composition (Campbell et al, 1997). In contrast, a recent study (Schroeder et al, 2001) using whole, piliated cells showed that a number of clinical isolates (of undefined pilin type), as well as laboratory strains including PAO1 and PAK, did not demonstrate differences in binding to host cells in the presence or absence of exogenously added aGM 1 receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of PilA in the B. exovorus JSS pilus was inferred using antibodies raised against the periplasmic predator B. bacteriovorus 109J's PilA, as the antisera inhibited attachment of B. exovorus JSS to prey cells (Mahmoud and Koval, 2010). Previous studies in Pseudomonas aeruginosa have shown that PilA antibodies were able to bind to a PilA C-terminal domain of variable sequence, suggesting that conformation and not sequence was important for antibody recognition (Campbell et al, 1997). Different predatory strategies may imply different anchoring mechanisms: in B. bacteriovorus, the predator needs to reach the cytoplasmic membrane in order to penetrate its prey (Abram et al, 1974), a process that may be mediated by type IV pili (Evans et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain how D regions with diverse sequences can provide similar functions, their adhesive properties were attributed to main chain-rather than side chain-based interactions (172). Those data led to a focus on development of anti-P. aeruginosa vaccines containing peptides corresponding to the D region (71,72,75,162,216). Newer information showing that the minor pilins are present in sheared pilus fractions (154,416) and that the orthologous PilC1 or PilC2 (Neisseria and Kingella) and PilY1 (Pseudomonas) proteins are potentially pilus associated and required for adherence to-and manipulation of-the host (174,204,217,288,289,384) suggests that additional studies are needed to unequivocally identify all T4aP adhesins.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%