2021
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.13591142.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction Region Indicator (IRI): A Very Simple Real Space Function Clearly Revealing Both Chemical Bonds and Weak Interactions

Abstract: Graphically revealing interaction regions in a chemical system enables chemists to notice the areas at a glance where significant interactions have formed, it is very helpful in studying chemical bonds, intermolecular and intramolecular interactions. Reduced density gradient (RDG) has already been widely employed in literatures to visually exhibit weak interaction regions, in fact it also has the ability of revealing chemical bonding regions. Unfortunately, RDG cannot clearly show both types of the interaction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, comparison of the most dominant TS, 1ad_S and its "epimer" 1ad_R suggest that the major factor contributing to the energy difference is the appreciably larger distortion energy of the silane fragment in the latter, likely rising from shorter C-Si bond (2.19Å vs 2.27Å) and slightly longer Si-H bond (1.61Å vs 1.60Å). Interaction region indicator (IRI) analysis 71 (processed by Multiwfn 3.8 dev. 72 ) revealed the appreciable differences in non-covalent interaction regions: the former features a larger and stronger van der Waals (vdW) attraction region between the Si-Me moiety and one of the P-Ar of the ligand as compared to the latter (Scheme 1C, red circled part in i vs ii), which likely helps increase the interaction energy, while reduce the strain of the fragments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, comparison of the most dominant TS, 1ad_S and its "epimer" 1ad_R suggest that the major factor contributing to the energy difference is the appreciably larger distortion energy of the silane fragment in the latter, likely rising from shorter C-Si bond (2.19Å vs 2.27Å) and slightly longer Si-H bond (1.61Å vs 1.60Å). Interaction region indicator (IRI) analysis 71 (processed by Multiwfn 3.8 dev. 72 ) revealed the appreciable differences in non-covalent interaction regions: the former features a larger and stronger van der Waals (vdW) attraction region between the Si-Me moiety and one of the P-Ar of the ligand as compared to the latter (Scheme 1C, red circled part in i vs ii), which likely helps increase the interaction energy, while reduce the strain of the fragments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong interactions are observed due to π-electrons conjunction within the aromatic ring i.e., for the C C link. Repulsion (steric effect) is exhibited for the C---O link and the Van der Waals interactions are found between the hydrogen and metal (Cu and Zn) atoms [ 30 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, although the metathesis of allenylcopper with PhSiH 3 via both 4-and 6-membered transition states are feasible, in the dppp ligated pathway, the four-membered transition state TS 4 dppp is lower in energy by 5.3 kcal/mol, likely due to the more favorable interaction energy (-46.6 kcal/mol) between the allenylcopper and silane moieties, as revealed by distortion interaction analysis, 78 to which the attractive dispersion interactions between P-aryl moieties of the ligand and the Ph group and the terminal C = CMe moiety on the allenylcopper play an important contribution, according to interaction region indicator analysis 79 (Fig. 3c, i).…”
Section: Mechanistic Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%