2017
DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2014.1324a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interaction, Structure, Social Presence, and Satisfaction in Online Learning

Abstract: There have been various studies about interaction, structure, social presence and satisfaction in online learning; however, there is not any research which represents the relationships among these concepts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship among these variables. The population of the study is involved 205 university students who enrolled bachelor degree completion program at the Ankara University. Structural equation modeling was used to test hypothesizes. The results of this study indi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
94
0
22

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
11
94
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, this investigation may further reinforce the previous scholars' assertions that learners' perceived level of social presence could be affected by the characteristics of the tools they used (Horzum, 2015), and the usage of online interactive tools can positively increase social presence (Weinel et al, 2009). This might be explained by the fact that students can get instant feedback, trace the editing, and interact with their group members through using synchronized communication tools when working collaboratively on a cross-disciplinary project.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, this investigation may further reinforce the previous scholars' assertions that learners' perceived level of social presence could be affected by the characteristics of the tools they used (Horzum, 2015), and the usage of online interactive tools can positively increase social presence (Weinel et al, 2009). This might be explained by the fact that students can get instant feedback, trace the editing, and interact with their group members through using synchronized communication tools when working collaboratively on a cross-disciplinary project.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Such works suggest that this kind of IPBL can help students to further develop creativity and overcome the barriers framed by disciplinary egocentrism. Empirical studies have proved that IPBL can help students to develop knowledge management processes, arouse their interest and motivation in the subject course, foster their involvement in the learning process, and increase the level of cognition and satisfaction with learning outcomes (Bisasutti, & El-Deghaidy, 2012, 2015Dekhane & Tsoi, 2010;Yueh et al, 2015), demonstrating the need, relevance and importance of interdisciplinary integration through IPBL in current pedagogical methodologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey was identical for survey 1 and 2, with survey 3 modified slightly to more clearly differentiate between DC Network and private online workspaces. Survey questions were developed based upon similar instruments examining communication, isolation, and engagement (e.g., Chen, 2001;Horzum, 2015;Huang, 2002;Sandoe, 2005). Student interactions, as measured by number of logins per week, were differentiated between those that did not log in, those that logged in once per week, and those that logged in two or more times per week.…”
Section: Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While participants within this study provided many ideas for services and methods of delivery, prior research on sense of community within the classroom can further provide blueprints for where to start in connecting the larger population. Approaches within the classroom that have demonstrated success in promoting online sense of community include: the use of discussion boards (Shin, 2003;Arslanyilmaz & Sullins, 2013;Rovai 2002c), opportunities for students to establish social presence within the online environment (Horzum, 2015;Richardson, Maeda, Lv, & Caskurlu, 2017;Stepich & Ertmer, 2003), active participation and support by the "instructor" or responsible party for each service (Beaudoin, 2002;Nash, 2005;Easton, 2003), and opportunities for students to interact with one and other (Moore, 1989;Drouin & Vartanian, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allowing students to connect and collaborate beyond their course could assist in improving social presence (Garrison, 2007;Rovai, 2002c). Higher levels of social presence have been shown to increase online student satisfaction (Horzum, 2015), cognitive presence (Gutiérrez-Santiuste, Rodríguez-Sabiote, & Gallego-Arrufat, 2015) and perceived learning (Richardson, Maeda, Lv, & Caskurlu, 2017), making social presence an item that should be addressed. Additionally, student engagement (Ouzts, 2006) and the elimination of feelings of isolation (Drouin & Vartanian, 2010;Lake, 1999) can result as students connect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%