2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

50
319
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(370 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
50
319
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…I prefer to learn new things from the teacher." Consistent with previous research (e.g., Cao & Philp, 2006;Ur, 1996), the results indicated that although students viewed pair and group work as an effective learning strategy that added diversity to the instructional tasks and helped more reserved students build confidence in speaking, more than half of them complained about the overuse of these tasks and were reluctant to frequently work with the same group members every session. This disproportionate use of pair and group work activities in ELT textbooks or in the classrooms could, in the long run, become even counterproductive in EFL contexts where, in many cases, learners from one linguistic background form the majority.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I prefer to learn new things from the teacher." Consistent with previous research (e.g., Cao & Philp, 2006;Ur, 1996), the results indicated that although students viewed pair and group work as an effective learning strategy that added diversity to the instructional tasks and helped more reserved students build confidence in speaking, more than half of them complained about the overuse of these tasks and were reluctant to frequently work with the same group members every session. This disproportionate use of pair and group work activities in ELT textbooks or in the classrooms could, in the long run, become even counterproductive in EFL contexts where, in many cases, learners from one linguistic background form the majority.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, the success of implementing pair and group work activities as effective learning or teaching strategies depends on a number of factors such as learners' willingness to communicate in the target language (Cao & Philp, 2006) and motivation to participate in these tasks. In addition, what pushes individuals to achieve a goal may vary across different cultural groups or learners.…”
Section: Bakhtiar Naghdipourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such discrepancies could, in essence, be ascribed to disparate conceptions of the nature of WTC. That is, while some researchers take account of it as a global, enduring, personality-based orientation, which is not influenced by the presence or absence of anxiety in different communication contexts, others regard it as a situation-based/situational variable (see Cao, 2011;Cao & Philip, 2006).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all these variables that make an individual's WTC susceptible to variation are: the sense of kinship between communicators, the register of discourse (the formality or informality of the situation), the degree of evaluation of the speaker, the topic of discussion, situational variables (MacIntyre et al, 1998), the group size in the classroom (Cao & Philp, 2006), sex and age (MacIntyre, Baker, Clément, & Donovan, 2002), culture (Barraclough, Christophel, & McCroskey, 1988) to name just a few. Moreover, WTC is not static.…”
Section: Willingness To Communicatementioning
confidence: 99%