2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactional implications of either/or-questions during telephone triage of callers with chest discomfort in out-of-hours primary care: A conversation analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, interviews with triage nurses revealed that the NTS may hinder triage, especially in very urgent calls where emotions of both triage nurses and patients are prominent during the telephone conversation 15. Previous studies from our research group showed that the accuracy of NTS was at the best moderate for patients with chest discomfort or suspected neurological deficits, and that both the NTS itself as working with the tool could be improved in these important domains 11 12 15 16. Thus, it is important to analyse the use of the NTS by triage nurses as well beside the NTS itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, interviews with triage nurses revealed that the NTS may hinder triage, especially in very urgent calls where emotions of both triage nurses and patients are prominent during the telephone conversation 15. Previous studies from our research group showed that the accuracy of NTS was at the best moderate for patients with chest discomfort or suspected neurological deficits, and that both the NTS itself as working with the tool could be improved in these important domains 11 12 15 16. Thus, it is important to analyse the use of the NTS by triage nurses as well beside the NTS itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reaching mutual understanding of symptoms was challenging, and the lack of a suitable, and shared, vocabulary was sometimes evident in Study IV. Conversations illustrated the role of telenurses as interpreters or translators of data between healthcare organisations and callers, as described by Greenberg (2009), but also illustrates the crucial role of callers in verbalising the problem in a constructive way (Erkelens et al, 2021;Holmström et al, 2021;Yliluoma & Palonen, 2020). If callers lack vocabulary, the telenurse must be able to suggest descriptions that are recognisable and intelligible for all callers.…”
Section: Satisfaction With Components Of Interactionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Using conversation analysis as analytic method in future research may elucidate good and/or bad strategies for the development of interaction on health information. Examples of such studies are Lopriore et al (2019), who found that contrasting present health status with normal health was a frequent and mostly successful way to examine symptoms without visual cues, while Erkelens et al (2021) identified that using either-/or formulated questions led to difficulties in verbal physical examinations. The challenge of providing clear advice has previously been described (Gamst-Jensen et al, 2017) but knowing that advice should be provided in a clear manner does not specify how this could be done.…”
Section: Satisfaction With Components Of Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deppermann and Spraz-Fogasy's (2011, p. 115) observations of history-taking in German doctor-patient interactions lead them to conclude that the contrast between open-ended and closed questions is "ideologically overrated" and does not take into account "the patients' power to negotiate what was made relevant by a question and their capacity to resist narrow expectations". Indeed, patients can highlight the insufficiency of the question formulation, problematisingfor examplethe restricted response options or presuppositions of a questioning utterance, as demonstrated by Erkelens et al (2021). Ultimately, a 'closed' question does not necessarily entail a minimal response and using an 'open' question does not guarantee that the respondent will say more.…”
Section: 'Doing Questioning'mentioning
confidence: 99%