2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between amiodarone and the hERG potassium channel pore determined with mutagenesis and in silico docking

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
77
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, hERG block induced by dronedarone and fluvoxamine was only weakly sensitivity to Y652A and F656A mutations. But in the case of amiodarone drug, its hERG blocking activity was significantly affected by Y652A mutation, but not by F656A. This clearly indicates that, although the hERG blockers bind to the same binding site at the inner cavity, their binding modes could be significantly different from each other.…”
Section: Herg Channel: Structural Topologymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similarly, hERG block induced by dronedarone and fluvoxamine was only weakly sensitivity to Y652A and F656A mutations. But in the case of amiodarone drug, its hERG blocking activity was significantly affected by Y652A mutation, but not by F656A. This clearly indicates that, although the hERG blockers bind to the same binding site at the inner cavity, their binding modes could be significantly different from each other.…”
Section: Herg Channel: Structural Topologymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This can explain why blocking compounds that are unaffected by experimental removal of channel inactivation are either small (perhexiline), bulky (erythromycin) or possess unusual chemical moieties (quinidine) and may not interact with 660–667 residues or interact in totally different ways. MD simulations were reported with the potent blocker amiodarone in the hERG cavity, with the halogenated ring surrounded by Phe656 residues and placing the benzofuranyl‐butyl moiety in close contact with the lower residues . That binding mode is in full agreement with the new binding mode, but may also be regarded to slightly resemble the “classical” one, due to the presence of an aliphatic tail in the lower part of the cavity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…It is thought that gating of hERG supposes conformational changes of the lower part of S6 helices, which may include a twisting of the whole helices and a positional change of the aromatic residues in the hERG cavity, placing them in an much more favorable position to interact with blockers . Similarly to clofilium and ibutilide, channel blocking by other potent blockers like MK‐499 (IC 50 =34 nM) and amiodarone (IC 50 =45 nM) was significantly reduced by V659A but also, to a lower extent, by mutating residues placed lower on S6. However, channel blocking by moderate‐affinity compounds like vesnarinone (IC 50 =1060 nM), cisapride (IC 50 =650 nM), terfenadine (IC 50 =350 nM), dofetilide (IC 50 =420 nM) and E‐4031 (IC 50 =570 nM) was inhibited by V659A mutation to different extents, but not by any mutation of residues located lower on the S6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the known low expression and altered kinetic properties of some hERG mutants (in particular T623A and F656A clones), we measured the inward current of the T623A and F656A mutants in high (94 mM) external K + solution, since the external K + concentration increase is aimed to maximize the inward tail currents [25, 26, 30]. Consequently, we tested lubeluzole block of wild-type I hERG under similar experimental conditions, to examine whether a change in the ionic conditions affects hERG affinity toward lubeluzole.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%