2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between biochar and litter priming: A three-source 14C and δ13C partitioning study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such priming interactions between native SOC and labile biochar OC are likely to depend in part on native SOC properties in addition to biochar OC properties and interactions among biochar OC pools (Cross and Sohi, 2011; Wang et al, 2016; Whitman et al, 2013, 2014). Specifically, biochar has been shown to cause selective positive priming of simple soil organic matter molecules and fresh plant residues (Arif et al, 2016; Cui et al, 2017; Farrell et al, 2015). Our findings of an apparent positive priming in response to bicarbonate‐soluble biochar OC amendment are in agreement with assertions that biochar LOC is largely responsible for observed positive priming effects of biochar (Cheng et al, 2016; Cross and Sohi, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such priming interactions between native SOC and labile biochar OC are likely to depend in part on native SOC properties in addition to biochar OC properties and interactions among biochar OC pools (Cross and Sohi, 2011; Wang et al, 2016; Whitman et al, 2013, 2014). Specifically, biochar has been shown to cause selective positive priming of simple soil organic matter molecules and fresh plant residues (Arif et al, 2016; Cui et al, 2017; Farrell et al, 2015). Our findings of an apparent positive priming in response to bicarbonate‐soluble biochar OC amendment are in agreement with assertions that biochar LOC is largely responsible for observed positive priming effects of biochar (Cheng et al, 2016; Cross and Sohi, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kettunen et al 2005Kettunen et al , 2007b. In the study of Cui et al (2017), microbes utilized N-poor (1.41%) litter but biochar addition only (non-significantly) enhanced the cumulative respiration. In mesocosm experiments with the same biochar and soil types as in this study, the biochar had only a minor and temporary impact on enzyme activities in the soil (Niemi et al 2015) and it increased microbial respiration only during dry conditions by increasing the soil moisture content (Saarnio et al 2013).…”
Section: Biochar Enhances Decomposition Of N-rich Littermentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some studies showed the total CO 2 emission in the biochar treatment and CO 2 amount derived from biochar (Kuzyakov et al 2009;Keith et al 2011;Naisse et al 2015a), and the decomposition amount of NSOC was calculated by the difference. Some studies showed the cumulative CO 2 emission derived from NSOC under different incubation stages (Cross and Sohi 2011;Keith et al 2011;Bruun and El-Zehery 2012;Singh et al 2012;Maestrini et al 2014b;Whitman et al 2014;Dharmakeerthi et al 2015;Rittl et al 2015;Cui et al 2017). X e and X c were calculated using the following equation:…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%