Interactions between Cardiac Pacemakers and Antishoplifting Security Systems

McIvor, Michael; Sridhar, S

doi:10.1056/nejm199811053391911

Cited by 15 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consequently, in the vicinity of EMF sources, various hazards for implant users need to be identified and evaluated, especially for users of AIMD. In the systematic considerations, the EMF influence on AIMD functions may be split into the following groups (where it is not excluded that they will present together): -influence on the electric circuit of the AIMD, -influence on the internal memory of the AIMD, -influence on mechanical structures -by heating, reposition, etc., Pacing inhibition (complete or temporary stop of pacing); the implant interprets electrical potentials from EMF electrodynamic interaction as the proper heart rate and stops the pacing, even in the absence of the intrinsic heart rate EAS systems [5,6]; induction hobs (25-34 kHz) [7]; GSM [6,[8][9][10]; vicinity of BTS [11,12]; MD gates [13]; MRI scanners (1.5 T) [6,14]; ESU [6,15] CP [11,12]; 3.4. 400 kV power lines [19]; 3.5.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the safety of users of active implantable medical devices (AIMD) in the working environment in terms of exposure to electromagnetic fields – practical approach to the requirements of European Directive 2013/35/EU

Zradziński

Karpowicz

Gryz

et al. 2018

Int J Occup Med Environ Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Electromagnetic fields (EMF) may cause malfunctions in electronic devices, in particular in active implantable medical devices (AIMD), along with discomfort or health hazards to users. The use of AIMD by workers is increasing (especially cardiac pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators and wearable insulin infusion pumps). Electromagnetic fields may be much stronger in the working environment than applied in basic immunity tests of AIMD (based on EN 60601-1-2:2015 and EN 50527-1:2016). European Directive 2013/35/EU regarding the safety of workers exposed to EMF considered the AIMD users to be "workers at particular risk" who need an individual evaluation of EMF hazards. The study aimed at evaluating the safety of users of AIMD in medical and industrial working environments exposed to EMF. Material and Methods: Near the common sources of strong EMF applied in medical and industrial use, the "standard safety distances" (SSD) for AIMD users were evaluated (i.e., distances from the EMF source, where exposure drops below limits from Recommendation 1999/519/EC and AIMD safety may be expected). The analysis is based on the results of measurements of magnetic and electric field strengths near 127 typical devices, in their normal use. Results: The longest electric field related SSD was identified near dielectric sealers (up to 180 cm), and the longest magnetic field related SSD -near induction heaters (up to 450 cm). Conclusions: Electromagnetic fields related AIMD malfunctions need to be considered up to several meters from EMF sources. The "individual safety distance," that is sufficient to ensure the safety of a particular AIMD user may be significantly different (usually shorter) from the presented SSD, but needs to be considered in the context of detailed safety data from the AIMD manufacturer (if available). The labelling indicating the location of the area of a strong EMF increases safety of AIMD users in the work environment.

show abstract