2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-021-01278-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions Between Cerebellum and the Intracortical Excitatory Circuits of Motor Cortex: a Mini-Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional interpretation of using different TMS coil orientations suggests preferential recruitment of early (I 1 ) waves with PA TMS and late (I 3 ) waves with AP TMS (Hamada et al., 2013 ), with either current direction able to recruit both early and late I‐waves as the stimulation intensity is increased (Di Lazzaro et al., 2003 , 2001 ). We therefore attempted to investigate the response of different I‐wave circuits to PMd iTBS by recording single‐pulse TMS at relatively lower stimulation intensities compared to MEP 1mV (PA 0.5mV and AP 0.5mV MEPs), where PA TMS is more selective to early circuits, whereas AP TMS is more selective to late circuits (Opie et al., 2022 ). Within the current study, the potentiation of both PA 0.5mV and AP 0.5mV MEPs (∼50–90% increase) in young adults following PMd iTBS therefore probably reflects the facilitation of early and late circuits respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional interpretation of using different TMS coil orientations suggests preferential recruitment of early (I 1 ) waves with PA TMS and late (I 3 ) waves with AP TMS (Hamada et al., 2013 ), with either current direction able to recruit both early and late I‐waves as the stimulation intensity is increased (Di Lazzaro et al., 2003 , 2001 ). We therefore attempted to investigate the response of different I‐wave circuits to PMd iTBS by recording single‐pulse TMS at relatively lower stimulation intensities compared to MEP 1mV (PA 0.5mV and AP 0.5mV MEPs), where PA TMS is more selective to early circuits, whereas AP TMS is more selective to late circuits (Opie et al., 2022 ). Within the current study, the potentiation of both PA 0.5mV and AP 0.5mV MEPs (∼50–90% increase) in young adults following PMd iTBS therefore probably reflects the facilitation of early and late circuits respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ROI seed analysis, we observed a significant increase in inhibition from the ROI to the bilateral DLPFC, language, motor, and sensory networks between pre- and post-CB-SMA iTBS protocols. The SMA and cerebellum communicate through the cortico-ponto-cerebellar tract and other possible CTC tracts ( 48 , 49 ). The inhibition effect ( 50 ), which originated from the SMA to the cortex including the anterior cingulate cortex, angular gyrus, and middle temporal, was observed through the fMRI after a 1-Hz repetitive TMS (rTMS) on SMA, interrupting the hyper-connections from the SMA to the cerebellum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PD is primarily a basal ganglia disorder, cerebellar involvement in PD pathophysiology provides a basis for targeting it with tDCS [ 13 , 14 ]. While M1 plays the predominant role in skilled execution of hand and arm movements [ 16 ], the descending drive of M1 to the spinal motor neuron pools of upper limb muscles depends on input from many motor areas onto intracortical interneurons [ 17 ] including crucial cerebellum contributions [ 17 , 18 ]. Furthermore, previously unknown bi-directional pathways have recently been discovered between the cerebellum and basal ganglia [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%