2012
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.061895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between cortisol and Rhesus glycoprotein expression in ureogenic toadfish, Opsanus beta

Abstract: SUMMARYIn their native environment, gulf toadfish excrete equal quantities of ammonia and urea. However, upon exposure to stressful conditions in the laboratory (i.e. crowding, confinement or air exposure), toadfish decrease branchial ammonia excretion and become ureotelic. The objective of this study was to determine the influences of cortisol and ammonia on ammonia excretion relative to expression of Rhesus (Rh) glycoproteins and the ammonia-fixing enzyme, glutamine synthetase (GS). In vivo infusions and/or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to those pathways, there is a growing focus on the facilitated diffusion of ammonia (likely in the form of NH 3 ) through a series of strategically positioned isoforms of ammonia-conducting Rh glycoproteins. Rh glycoproteins have been identified in several fish species, and on the basis of gene/protein expression analyses and lossof-function studies, it is clear that Rh glycoproteins constitute an important mechanism for ammonia excretion in fish (Nakada et al 2007a(Nakada et al , 2007bNawata et al 2007;Shih et al 2008;Braun et al 2009a;Braun and Perry 2010;Perry et al 2010;Wu et al 2010;Rodela et al 2012;Bucking et al 2013a; for recent reviews on mechanisms of ammonia excretion, see Wright andWood 2009, 2012). The existence of multiple mechanisms for ammonia excretion highlights the importance of effectively removing ammonia to prevent its toxic effects (Chew et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to those pathways, there is a growing focus on the facilitated diffusion of ammonia (likely in the form of NH 3 ) through a series of strategically positioned isoforms of ammonia-conducting Rh glycoproteins. Rh glycoproteins have been identified in several fish species, and on the basis of gene/protein expression analyses and lossof-function studies, it is clear that Rh glycoproteins constitute an important mechanism for ammonia excretion in fish (Nakada et al 2007a(Nakada et al , 2007bNawata et al 2007;Shih et al 2008;Braun et al 2009a;Braun and Perry 2010;Perry et al 2010;Wu et al 2010;Rodela et al 2012;Bucking et al 2013a; for recent reviews on mechanisms of ammonia excretion, see Wright andWood 2009, 2012). The existence of multiple mechanisms for ammonia excretion highlights the importance of effectively removing ammonia to prevent its toxic effects (Chew et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental tanks were assigned (random permutation) to one of four treatments: predator absent with sham implant (Sham), predator absent with cortisol implant (CORT), predator present with sham implant (P+Sham) and predator present with metyrapone implant (P+MTP). Metyrapone, here used as a cortisol blocker, acts by inhibiting the synthesis of cortisol from 11-deoxycortisol by 11β-hydroxylase, a biomedical process that has been demonstrated to successfully inhibit cortisol synthesis in teleost fish (Hopkins et al, 1995;Milligan, 2003;Rodela et al, 2012). On 10 December, all fish were weighed (to the nearest 0.1 g) to enable calculation of the total volume of substances needed to produce implants suitable for body mass-specific delivery (see 'Implants', below).…”
Section: Experimental Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Rodela et al. ; Zimmer and Wood ), thus making repeated sampling possible over short sampling intervals. However, applying a “rule” across the board is not helpful, especially considering the great diversity in fish size and physiology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3-month interval proposed by Duman et al (2019) has no scientific basis: sometimes it may be on the order of minutes or hours, and in other cases it may be weeks or months depending on the nature of the research questions being asked. The effects of repeated blood sampling on parameters such as hematocrit can be offset by re-injecting salinesuspended red cells back into the animal (e.g., Rogers et al 2003;Rodela et al 2012;Zimmer and Wood 2014), thus making repeated sampling possible over short sampling intervals. However, applying a "rule" across the board is not helpful, especially considering the great diversity in fish size and physiology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%