2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0029665113003662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between nutrition and immune function: using inflammation biomarkers to interpret micronutrient status

Abstract: The immune response promotes a complex series of reactions by the host in an effort to prevent ongoing tissue damage, isolate and destroy the infective organism and activate the repair processes that are necessary for restoring normal function. The homoeostatic process is known as inflammation and the early set of reactions that are induced are known as the acute phase response (APR). The APR has marked effects on the circulation, metabolism in the liver and the plasma concentration of many nutrients. The chan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…37 As with our ferritin results, we were not able to completely adjust for inflammation because AGP data were not available. 14 Our study has strengths and limitations. All three common STH infections were prevalent in this population, which meant the number of children with single infections by either Ascaris or Trichuris and with multiple infections were large enough to provide reasonable estimates for these groups separately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…37 As with our ferritin results, we were not able to completely adjust for inflammation because AGP data were not available. 14 Our study has strengths and limitations. All three common STH infections were prevalent in this population, which meant the number of children with single infections by either Ascaris or Trichuris and with multiple infections were large enough to provide reasonable estimates for these groups separately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Non‐iron deficiency anemia (NIDA) includes anemia because of blood loss or red blood cell destruction, for example, resulting from infectious disease processes (particularly hookworm; Darnton‐Hill et al, ; Lynch, ; Thurnham & Northrop‐Clewes, ; Thurnham, ), as well as anemia resulting from micronutrient deficiencies other than iron deficiency. NIDA may also include cases with rarer chronic diseases such as autoimmune hemolytic anemia or bone marrow cancer; however, it is unlikely that these are important in explaining anemia in the current study in northern Kenya among seemingly healthy mothers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In environments with high disease load and food insecurity, multiple types of anemia may coexist. Anemic individuals may be heterogeneous in terms of the primary causation of anemia, with some suffering anemia because of nutritional deficiencies or because of infection, whereas others have anemia from the combined effects of nutritional deficiencies, infection, and inflammation; similarly, infectious disease may be contributing to anemia both directly and through inflammatory pathways restricting the uptake, availability, and recycling of iron (Drakesmith & Prentice, ; Thurnham, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of the APR on nutritional biomarkers is well known and documented in the literature (1618). The APR is characterized by a complex and systemic inflammatory reaction to disruptions in the body’s homeostasis in response to infection, tissue damage, immunologic disorders, and other conditions.…”
Section: Aim 2 Findings: Relations Between Inflammation and Biomarkermentioning
confidence: 99%