1995
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(94)00656-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between Ostertagia ostertagi and Cooperia oncophora in calves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is difficult to distinguish between species in faecal samples, with large numbers of eggs produced by Cooperia worms implying threshold values of FEC may not be representative of O. ostertagi burdens. Although there does not appear to be inter-species interactions (Kloosterman et al., 1984, Satrija and Nansen, 1993, Hilderson et al., 1995) there are important consequences for levels of protein loss, hence modification of the model to account for Cooperia would prove beneficial in future development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to distinguish between species in faecal samples, with large numbers of eggs produced by Cooperia worms implying threshold values of FEC may not be representative of O. ostertagi burdens. Although there does not appear to be inter-species interactions (Kloosterman et al., 1984, Satrija and Nansen, 1993, Hilderson et al., 1995) there are important consequences for levels of protein loss, hence modification of the model to account for Cooperia would prove beneficial in future development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monospecific and concurrent artificial infections of O. ostertagi and Cooperia suggested an absence of inter-species interactions (Kloosterman et al 1984 ; Satrija and Nansen, 1993 ; Hilderson et al 1995 ). Concurrent infections did, however, show greater than additive FEC in comparison with the two monospecific infections (Kloosterman et al 1984 ; Satrija and Nansen, 1993 ; Hilderson et al 1995 ), thought to be a consequence of enhanced pathological effects (Parkins et al 1990 ). This has been suggested to reflect the fact that Cooperia increases the rate of protein loss leading to a reduced growth rate and growth requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, very little is known about these cells, despite numerous studies indicating the importance of GLs in parasite immunology. GLs have been associated with resistance to O. ostertagi, Trichostrongylus colubriformis, H. contortus, and other helminths in the past (43)(44)(45)(46). The exact effector mechanism used by GLs against worms is still unclear, but as granulysin was detected in mucus, granule exocytosis could be one of these effector mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%