1969
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1969.tb07840.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between Plants and Epiphytic Bacteria Regarding Their Auxin Metabolism

Abstract: Using hydrocultured pea plants, 109 bacterial strains (42 from shoots) were isolated from shoots, roots, and from the hydroculture medium. 58 different strains (26 from shoots) were able to produce IAA from tryptophan, 15 different strains (7 from shoots) were able lo destroy IAA. (Included are 13 strains possessing both properties.) As far as they could be identified, the IAA‐producing and ‐destroying strains belong to Pseudomonas (by far dominating), Achromobacter, Alcaligenses, Bacillus, and Flavobacterium.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another factor influencing the degradation and growth utilization of IAA is catabolite repression. Although the presence of fructose or glucose did not interfere with the ability of P. putida 1290 to degrade IAA, Libbert and Risch reported that degradation of IAA by their isolates was reduced in the presence of 0.2% glucose in phosphate buffer and even abolished with 5% glucose or 1% malic acid (23). In both the rhizosphere and on leaves, sugars such as glucose and fructose are abundantly available (16,21), suggesting that in such environments strains such as the ones described by Libbert and Rische would be less able to utilize available IAA and therefore would have a disadvantage over strains such as P. putida 1290.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another factor influencing the degradation and growth utilization of IAA is catabolite repression. Although the presence of fructose or glucose did not interfere with the ability of P. putida 1290 to degrade IAA, Libbert and Risch reported that degradation of IAA by their isolates was reduced in the presence of 0.2% glucose in phosphate buffer and even abolished with 5% glucose or 1% malic acid (23). In both the rhizosphere and on leaves, sugars such as glucose and fructose are abundantly available (16,21), suggesting that in such environments strains such as the ones described by Libbert and Rische would be less able to utilize available IAA and therefore would have a disadvantage over strains such as P. putida 1290.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is surprising given the early realization that, like BIPs, bacterial IAA degraders (BIDs) are abundantly associated with plants (1,2,23,29,38,49). Actually, BIDs were also considered a source of contamination, since their ability to destroy IAA obscured true levels of IAA in plant tissues (30,46).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This hydroxylation has been described for the microorganism Pseudomonasfluorescens (21,28). It may, thus, be suspected that the indolyl-C, compounds observed in experiments with Orobanche are actually formed by contaminant bacteria (12). This suspicion is favored by the fact that, the epiphytic bacteria isolated from the plant material were flagellate and resistant to chloroamphenicol and, thus, may belong to the genus Pseudomonas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Libbert and co-workers reported that such bacteria are responsible for the indoleacetic acid formed from tryptophan in incubation mixtures, including plant tissue from pea seedlings and a variety of other plant tissue (22,23). Large populations of Bacillus subtilis have been associated with phosphorus toxicity in soybeans (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%