2001
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/23.1.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions Between Predator Kairomone and Food Level Complicate the Ecological Interpretation of Daphnia Laboratory Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3c,d). A tendency to produce smaller eggs in the presence of Wsh kairomone has already been found by Machábek (1991) and Stibor (1992), and the phenomenon of earlier reproduction being induced more readily by kairomones at low than at high food levels was reported by Weber (2001) and Hülsmann at al. (2004), which both explain why the mean egg volume was not found to be reduced as much at low as it was at high food levels in the presence of Wsh kairomone in our study (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…3c,d). A tendency to produce smaller eggs in the presence of Wsh kairomone has already been found by Machábek (1991) and Stibor (1992), and the phenomenon of earlier reproduction being induced more readily by kairomones at low than at high food levels was reported by Weber (2001) and Hülsmann at al. (2004), which both explain why the mean egg volume was not found to be reduced as much at low as it was at high food levels in the presence of Wsh kairomone in our study (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In both these cases, daphnids matured earlier at a smaller size and with fewer eggs. Similar response was also observed at low food concentrations when fish chemicals were present (Weber 2001). Presence of gape limited predators and low food levels are quite common within the beds of submerged macrophytes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This ambiguity in the response is indicative of the complexity of the response of Daphnia to different environmental cues and/or internal states such as hunger level (Weetman and Atkinson 2002). While we attempted to hold all conditions constant (e.g., Daphnia were cultured in a similar manner and fed the day before each experiment), differences in the resources and light levels in the culturing environment of Daphnia, in their handling during transfer to the experiment, or in the preparation of Mysis cue, may have caused the Daphnia to respond differently (Weber 2001). While more research is required to understand the complexity of the response, the ambiguity does not change our principal result that Lake Michigan D. mendotae can perceive and respond to the presence of Mysis kairomones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resource conditions can affect the magnitude of predator-induced changes in prey behavior (Werner and Anholt 1993, Grand and Dill 1999, Weber 2001, Weetman and Atkinson 2002. These experiments also served to test the robustness of the results of Experiment 1 and to shed insight into the origin of the kairomone to which D. mendotae respond.…”
Section: Specific Experimental Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%