2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions between solute atoms in Fe–Si–Al–C alloys as studied by mechanical spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both ferrite and austenite, the minimum energy of formation, which could be found in the calculations by moving C away from Si, was comparable to the one in pure Fe (+0.7 eV in ferrite and slightly negative in austenite, in agreement with literature results [12,[24][25][26][27]). Thus, the presence of Si does not seem to increase the solubility of C but rather decreases it.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both ferrite and austenite, the minimum energy of formation, which could be found in the calculations by moving C away from Si, was comparable to the one in pure Fe (+0.7 eV in ferrite and slightly negative in austenite, in agreement with literature results [12,[24][25][26][27]). Thus, the presence of Si does not seem to increase the solubility of C but rather decreases it.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In general, ab initio results indicate a repulsive interaction of C with substitutional Si in ferrite [24,25] , but the excess solution enthalpy for Fe-C and Fe-Si-strongly depends on the interatomic distance. From the binding energies calculated for the octahedral and tetrahedral positions for C, the activation energy or energy barrier to diffuse the C atom from one octahedral to another octahedral position through the tetrahedral interstitial in a pure Fe system, was determined to be ∆E =0.87 eV [12,24], which agrees well with experimental results [26,27]. The changes of these energy barriers in the presence of Si lead to the effect that at lower C concentrations, Si diminishes the C diffusivity [25].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The slight broadening of the peak from the hightemperature side suggests the appearance of a second Snoek-type peak (P2) at higher temperature due to interstitial (C)esubstitutional (Ga) atoms interaction. The broadening of the Snoek-type peak due to appearance of the second ies peak is typical for several FeeCeMe (where Me is a metal with a weak tendency to form carbide) [6], and has been reported for the FeeAl, FeeGe and FeeSi systems earlier in papers [7,13]. It has been shown that the two Snoek-type peaks result from carbon jumps within the FeeCeFe and FeeCeMe (Me ¼ Al, Ge, Si) surroundings, respectively, indicating a long-range elastic interaction between the interstitial C and substitutional solutes in iron.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Thus the Zener peak in disordered Fe-Al alloys (w800 K for 1 Hz) can be observed up to 22at%Al and only 11at%Si. It is largely suppressed in ternary Fe-Al-Si alloys due to a mutual compensation of the distortions produced by the big Al and small Si atoms, respectively [43]. P LT The two ''low-temperature'' (P LT1 þ P LT2 ) peaks, measured in both bcc-type and hexagonal Fe-Ge alloys and not explained in detail, are most probably linked with dislocations.…”
Section: Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%